Engineer B Mixed-Authorship Design Submission Without Delineation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Engineer_B_Mixed-Authorship_Design_Submission_Without_Delineation
Properties
Instance of
UndifferentiatedMixed-AuthorshipDesignSubmissionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#UndifferentiatedMixed-AuthorshipDesignSubmissionState
Active period
From the time Engineer B began modifying Engineer A's plans through submission of the combined documents without attribution markings
Affected parties
Client
Engineer A
Engineer B
Public relying on the design
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
The design documents submitted by Engineer B combining Engineer A's original work with Engineer B's modifications
Terminated by
Not terminated — the documents were submitted in mixed-authorship form without resolution
Triggering event
Engineer B's decision to use Engineer A's plans as a partial design basis and integrate his own modifications without marking the distinction
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B appears to have 'mixed and matched' the plans prepared by Engineer A with what he thought would be appropriate, never indicating which represented the work of Engineer A and which represented his own work
Text references
Engineer B appears to have 'mixed and matched' the plans prepared by Engineer A with what he thought would be appropriate, never indicating which represented the work of Engineer A and which represented his own work
Engineer B had an ethical obligation to make all necessary notations of changes which he had made with respect to the grading plans, housing pads, routing of streets, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities
His failure to do so constituted a form of deception which places him in violation of Section III.3.a
TTL
@prefix case173: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case173:Engineer_B_Mixed-Authorship_Design_Submission_Without_Delineation a proeth:UndifferentiatedMixed-AuthorshipDesignSubmissionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Mixed-Authorship Design Submission Without Delineation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the time Engineer B began modifying Engineer A's plans through submission of the combined documents without attribution markings" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client",
"Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Public relying on the design" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T14:17:17.434245+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T14:17:17.434245+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B appears to have 'mixed and matched' the plans prepared by Engineer A with what he thought would be appropriate, never indicating which represented the work of Engineer A and which represented his own work" ;
proeth:stateclass "Undifferentiated Mixed-Authorship Design Submission State" ;
proeth:subject "The design documents submitted by Engineer B combining Engineer A's original work with Engineer B's modifications" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not terminated — the documents were submitted in mixed-authorship form without resolution" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B appears to have 'mixed and matched' the plans prepared by Engineer A with what he thought would be appropriate, never indicating which represented the work of Engineer A and which represented his own work",
"Engineer B had an ethical obligation to make all necessary notations of changes which he had made with respect to the grading plans, housing pads, routing of streets, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities",
"His failure to do so constituted a form of deception which places him in violation of Section III.3.a" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer B's decision to use Engineer A's plans as a partial design basis and integrate his own modifications without marking the distinction" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 173 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:41:54.497780"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 173 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
173
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T14:17:17.434245+00:00
First case
173
Generated
2026-03-01T14:17:17.434245+00:00
Attributed to
Case 173 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:41:54.497780
Generated by
ProEthica Case 173 Extraction