Engineer-Notification-Right-Review-Instance
Individual
dcc3497d
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Engineer-Notification-Right-Review-Instance
Properties
Parent
EngineerNotificationRightinReviewContexts
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerNotificationRightinReviewContexts
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.87
Createdby
Professional engineering practice norms / NSPE
Documenttitle
Engineer Notification Right in Review Contexts
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Engineer Notification Right in Review Contexts
Usedby
Engineer B upon being retained to review and redesign Engineer A's plans
Usedincontext
Governs whether Engineer B had an obligation to notify Engineer A that his sealed plans were being reviewed and substantially redesigned, particularly given that Engineer A's seal remained on the modified documents
Version
N/A — professional norm
Source Evidence
Source Text
At no time after Engineer B was retained were there any communications between the two engineers.
Text References
At no time after Engineer B was retained were there any communications between the two engineers.
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_173: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Engineer-Notification-Right-Review-Instance> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Notification-Right-Review-Instance" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerNotificationRightinReviewContexts> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
dcc3497da6ea7154...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
173
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T14:15:01.899898+00:00
First Case
173
Generated
2026-03-01T14:15:01.899898+00:00
Attributed To
Case 173 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:41:54.492634
Generated By
ProEthica Case 173 Extraction