Engineer A Cross-Side Retention in Active Litigation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/172#Engineer_A_Cross-Side_Retention_in_Active_Litigation
Properties
Instance of
Cross-SideRetentionAfterConfidentialPlaintiffAccessState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Cross-SideRetentionAfterConfidentialPlaintiffAccessState
Active period
From the moment Engineer A accepted retention by Attorney X through the Board's ethical determination
Affected parties
Attorney X (defendant's attorney)
Attorney Z (plaintiff's attorney)
Defendant
Engineer A
Plaintiff
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's engagement by defendant's attorney (Attorney X) after having been retained by plaintiff's attorney (Attorney Z) in the same legal proceeding
Terminated by
Board determination that the engagement was ethically impermissible
Triggering event
Attorney X's approach to retain Engineer A after Engineer A's termination by Attorney Z in the same proceeding
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
the mere fact that Engineer A ceased performing services for Attorney Z would not be an adequate solution to the ethical dilemma at hand
Text references
Nor do we believe that latter point that Engineer A would be capable of providing a 'separate and independent' report for the defendant in this case
This Board cannot accept the proposition that following the termination of his relationship with attorney for the plaintiff he would 'blot all' of that information from his mind
the mere fact that Engineer A ceased performing services for Attorney Z would not be an adequate solution to the ethical dilemma at hand
TTL
@prefix case172: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/172#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case172:Engineer_A_Cross-Side_Retention_in_Active_Litigation a proeth:Cross-SideRetentionAfterConfidentialPlaintiffAccessState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Cross-Side Retention in Active Litigation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the moment Engineer A accepted retention by Attorney X through the Board's ethical determination" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Attorney X (defendant's attorney)",
"Attorney Z (plaintiff's attorney)",
"Defendant",
"Engineer A",
"Plaintiff" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "172" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:09:00.386512+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "172" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:09:00.386512+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the mere fact that Engineer A ceased performing services for Attorney Z would not be an adequate solution to the ethical dilemma at hand" ;
proeth:stateclass "Cross-Side Retention After Confidential Plaintiff Access State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's engagement by defendant's attorney (Attorney X) after having been retained by plaintiff's attorney (Attorney Z) in the same legal proceeding" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Board determination that the engagement was ethically impermissible" ;
proeth:textreferences "Nor do we believe that latter point that Engineer A would be capable of providing a 'separate and independent' report for the defendant in this case",
"This Board cannot accept the proposition that following the termination of his relationship with attorney for the plaintiff he would 'blot all' of that information from his mind",
"the mere fact that Engineer A ceased performing services for Attorney Z would not be an adequate solution to the ethical dilemma at hand" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Attorney X's approach to retain Engineer A after Engineer A's termination by Attorney Z in the same proceeding" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 172 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:28:40.763702"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 172 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
172
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:09:00.386512+00:00
First case
172
Generated
2026-03-01T18:09:00.386512+00:00
Attributed to
Case 172 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:28:40.763702
Generated by
ProEthica Case 172 Extraction