Adversarial-Proceeding-Conflict-of-Interest-Standard

Rs · Resource Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/172#Adversarial-Proceeding-Conflict-of-Interest-Standard
Properties
Instance of
AdversarialProceedingConflictofInterestStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdversarialProceedingConflictofInterestStandard
Confidence
0.9
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review (through accumulated BER decisions)
Document title
Adversarial Proceeding Conflict of Interest Standard
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Used in context
Governs Engineer A's ethical obligations when switching from plaintiff's expert to defendant's expert within the same legal proceeding, including the prohibition on representing adverse interests without former client consent and the duty to protect confidential information
Version
N/A — derived from NSPE Code and BER precedents
Source Evidence
Source text
All of the aforementioned cases represent longheld BER views relating to the question of conflicts of interest and the duty of engineers who gain, or are perceived to have gained, access to knowledge that may be advantageous to one client and disadvantageous to another.

Text references
All of the aforementioned cases represent longheld BER views relating to the question of conflicts of interest and the duty of engineers who gain, or are perceived to have gained, access to knowledge that may be advantageous to one client and disadvantageous to another.
TTL
@prefix case172: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/172#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case172:Adversarial-Proceeding-Conflict-of-Interest-Standard a proeth:AdversarialProceedingConflictofInterestStandard, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Adversarial-Proceeding-Conflict-of-Interest-Standard" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review (through accumulated BER decisions)" ; proeth:discoveredincase "172" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:documenttitle "Adversarial Proceeding Conflict of Interest Standard" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:08:08.354357+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "172" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:08:08.354357+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:resourceclass "Adversarial Proceeding Conflict of Interest Standard" ; proeth:sourcetext "All of the aforementioned cases represent longheld BER views relating to the question of conflicts of interest and the duty of engineers who gain, or are perceived to have gained, access to knowledge that may be advantageous to one client and disadvantageous to another." ; proeth:textreferences "All of the aforementioned cases represent longheld BER views relating to the question of conflicts of interest and the duty of engineers who gain, or are perceived to have gained, access to knowledge that may be advantageous to one client and disadvantageous to another." ; proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ; proeth:usedincontext "Governs Engineer A's ethical obligations when switching from plaintiff's expert to defendant's expert within the same legal proceeding, including the prohibition on representing adverse interests without former client consent and the duty to protect confidential information" ; proeth:version "N/A — derived from NSPE Code and BER precedents" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 172 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:28:40.762824"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 172 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
172
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:08:08.354357+00:00
First case
172
Generated
2026-03-01T18:08:08.354357+00:00
Attributed to
Case 172 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:28:40.762824
Generated by
ProEthica Case 172 Extraction