Engineer B Pertinent Fact Dual-Element Misrepresentation Test Brochure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#Engineer_B_Pertinent_Fact_Dual-Element_Misrepresentation_Test_Brochure
Properties
Instance of
PertinentFactDual-ElementMisrepresentationTestComplianceObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PertinentFactDual-ElementMisrepresentationTestComplianceObligation
Case context
Engineer B continued distributing the brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee after the termination notice and after actual termination, raising the question of whether both elements of the misrepresentation test were satisfied.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to evaluate the continued distribution of the brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee against both elements of the pertinent-fact misrepresentation test: (1) whether Engineer A's status as a key employee was pertinent to prospective client selection decisions, and (2) whether continued distribution was made with intent to enhance the firm's qualifications beyond what was accurate — and to refrain from distributing materials satisfying both elements simultaneously.
Temporal scope
Throughout the period of brochure distribution after the termination notice
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer B Post-Termination Brochure Continued Use
derivedFromPrinciple
Pertinent Fact Misrepresentation Dual-Element Test Applied to Engineer B Brochure
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees
Text references
Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees
continued to use the previously printed brochure with Engineer A's name in it well after Engineer B did in fact terminate Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case171: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case171:Engineer_B_Pertinent_Fact_Dual-Element_Misrepresentation_Test_Brochure a proeth:PertinentFactDual-ElementMisrepresentationTestComplianceObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Pertinent Fact Dual-Element Misrepresentation Test Brochure" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case171:Engineer_B_Post-Termination_Brochure_Continued_Use ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B continued distributing the brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee after the termination notice and after actual termination, raising the question of whether both elements of the misrepresentation test were satisfied." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case171:Pertinent_Fact_Misrepresentation_Dual-Element_Test_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Brochure ;
proeth:discoveredincase "171" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "171" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Pertinent Fact Dual-Element Misrepresentation Test Compliance Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to evaluate the continued distribution of the brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee against both elements of the pertinent-fact misrepresentation test: (1) whether Engineer A's status as a key employee was pertinent to prospective client selection decisions, and (2) whether continued distribution was made with intent to enhance the firm's qualifications beyond what was accurate — and to refrain from distributing materials satisfying both elements simultaneously." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the period of brochure distribution after the termination notice" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees",
"continued to use the previously printed brochure with Engineer A's name in it well after Engineer B did in fact terminate Engineer A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 171 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:51:15.276772"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 171 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
171
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00
First case
171
Generated
2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00
Attributed to
Case 171 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:51:15.276772
Generated by
ProEthica Case 171 Extraction