Engineer B Case-by-Case Brochure Misrepresentation Pertinence Assessment
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#Engineer_B_Case-by-Case_Brochure_Misrepresentation_Pertinence_Assessment
Properties
Instance of
Case-by-CaseBrochureMisrepresentationPertinenceAssessmentObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Case-by-CaseBrochureMisrepresentationPertinenceAssessmentObligation
Case context
Engineer B continued distributing the brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee without conducting a pertinence assessment of whether this constituted a misrepresentation given Engineer A's changed status.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer B
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to conduct a case-by-case assessment of whether continued listing of Engineer A as a key employee in the firm's brochure constituted a misrepresentation of a pertinent fact, considering whether Engineer A was highlighted as a key employee, whether Engineer A's departure materially altered the firm's qualifications, and whether there was intent to enhance firm qualifications — rather than assuming continued distribution was permissible because the brochure had been previously printed.
Temporal scope
From issuance of termination notice through cessation of brochure distribution
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Pertinent Fact Misrepresentation Dual-Element Test Applied to Engineer B Brochure
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees
Text references
Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees
continued to use the previously printed brochure with Engineer A's name in it well after Engineer B did in fact terminate Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case171: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case171:Engineer_B_Case-by-Case_Brochure_Misrepresentation_Pertinence_Assessment a proeth:Case-by-CaseBrochureMisrepresentationPertinenceAssessmentObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Case-by-Case Brochure Misrepresentation Pertinence Assessment" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case171:Engineer_B_Brochure_Intent-Differentiated_Misrepresentation_Assessment ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B continued distributing the brochure listing Engineer A as a key employee without conducting a pertinence assessment of whether this constituted a misrepresentation given Engineer A's changed status." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case171:Pertinent_Fact_Misrepresentation_Dual-Element_Test_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Brochure ;
proeth:discoveredincase "171" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "171" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Case-by-Case Brochure Misrepresentation Pertinence Assessment Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to conduct a case-by-case assessment of whether continued listing of Engineer A as a key employee in the firm's brochure constituted a misrepresentation of a pertinent fact, considering whether Engineer A was highlighted as a key employee, whether Engineer A's departure materially altered the firm's qualifications, and whether there was intent to enhance firm qualifications — rather than assuming continued distribution was permissible because the brochure had been previously printed." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees" ;
proeth:temporalscope "From issuance of termination notice through cessation of brochure distribution" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B distributed a previously printed brochure listing Engineer A as one of Engineer B's key employees",
"continued to use the previously printed brochure with Engineer A's name in it well after Engineer B did in fact terminate Engineer A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 171 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:51:15.277899"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 171 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
171
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00
First case
171
Generated
2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00
Attributed to
Case 171 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:51:15.277899
Generated by
ProEthica Case 171 Extraction