Engineer A No Written Non-Compete Agreement
Individual
34ec16c5
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#Engineer_A_No_Written_Non-Compete_Agreement
Properties
Parent
NoWrittenNon-CompeteAgreementState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#NoWrittenNon-CompeteAgreementState
Activeperiod
Throughout the case
Affectedparties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Stateclass
No Written Non-Compete Agreement State
Subject
Absence of any formal written restriction on Engineer A's post-employment competitive activities vis-à-vis Engineer B's clients
Terminatedby
Not terminated within the case timeframe
Triggeringevent
No written non-compete agreement was established at the time of Engineer A's hiring or during employment
Urgencylevel
low
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A thereupon notified clients of Engineer B that Engineer A was planning to start another engineering firm and would appreciate being considered for future work
Text References
Engineer A thereupon notified clients of Engineer B that Engineer A was planning to start another engineering firm and would appreciate being considered for future work
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_171: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#Engineer_A_No_Written_Non-Compete_Agreement> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A No Written Non-Compete Agreement" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#NoWrittenNon-CompeteAgreementState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
34ec16c56eef673c...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
171
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T14:24:15.972252+00:00
First Case
171
Generated
2026-03-02T14:24:15.972252+00:00
Attributed To
Case 171 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:51:15.264642
Generated By
ProEthica Case 171 Extraction