Engineer A Employer-Initiated Termination Pre-Departure Client Solicitation Permissibility

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#Engineer_A_Employer-Initiated_Termination_Pre-Departure_Client_Solicitation_Permissibility
Properties
Instance of
Employer-InitiatedTerminationNoticePre-DepartureClientSolicitationPermissibilityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Employer-InitiatedTerminationNoticePre-DepartureClientSolicitationPermissibilityObligation
Case context
Engineer B terminated Engineer A for lack of work; Engineer A immediately notified Engineer B's clients of his new firm and sought future work while continuing to work for Engineer B during the notice period.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A, having received an employer-initiated termination notice from Engineer B on November 15, 1982, was obligated to recognize that soliciting Engineer B's clients for future work with his new firm was ethically permissible under the at-will employment symmetry principle, provided no active contracts were supplanted and no specialized confidential knowledge was exploited, and to conduct such solicitation honestly and without disparagement of Engineer B.
Temporal scope
From receipt of termination notice (November 15, 1982) through actual departure
Source Evidence
Source text
On November 15, 1982 Engineer B notified Engineer A that Engineer B was going to terminate Engineer A because of lack of work.

Text references
Engineer A continued to work for Engineer B for several additional months after the November termination notice.
Engineer A thereupon notified clients of Engineer B that Engineer A was planning to start another engineering firm and would appreciate being considered for future work.
On November 15, 1982 Engineer B notified Engineer A that Engineer B was going to terminate Engineer A because of lack of work.
TTL
@prefix case171: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/171#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case171:Engineer_A_Employer-Initiated_Termination_Pre-Departure_Client_Solicitation_Permissibility a proeth:Employer-InitiatedTerminationNoticePre-DepartureClientSolicitationPermissibilityObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Employer-Initiated Termination Pre-Departure Client Solicitation Permissibility" ; proeth-core:competesWith case171:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Duty_During_Notice_Period_BER-82, case171:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Notice-Period_Boundary, case171:Engineer_A_Pre-Departure_Competitive_Solicitation_Employer_Disclosure_BER-82, case171:Engineer_A_Specialized_Knowledge_Employer_Disclosure_Before_Competitive_Use_BER-82 ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case171:Engineer_A_Active_Client_Solicitation_During_Continued_Employment, case171:Engineer_A_Covert_Current-Client_Solicitation_While_Employed, case171:Engineer_A_Pending_Termination_Notice_Active_Employment_Continuation, case171:Engineer_A_Specialized_Knowledge_Solicitation_Risk ; proeth:casecontext "Engineer B terminated Engineer A for lack of work; Engineer A immediately notified Engineer B's clients of his new firm and sought future work while continuing to work for Engineer B during the notice period." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case171:At-Will_Employment_Symmetry_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Upon_Termination_Notice ; proeth:discoveredincase "171" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "171" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Employer-Initiated Termination Notice Pre-Departure Client Solicitation Permissibility Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A, having received an employer-initiated termination notice from Engineer B on November 15, 1982, was obligated to recognize that soliciting Engineer B's clients for future work with his new firm was ethically permissible under the at-will employment symmetry principle, provided no active contracts were supplanted and no specialized confidential knowledge was exploited, and to conduct such solicitation honestly and without disparagement of Engineer B." ; proeth:sourcetext "On November 15, 1982 Engineer B notified Engineer A that Engineer B was going to terminate Engineer A because of lack of work." ; proeth:temporalscope "From receipt of termination notice (November 15, 1982) through actual departure" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A continued to work for Engineer B for several additional months after the November termination notice.", "Engineer A thereupon notified clients of Engineer B that Engineer A was planning to start another engineering firm and would appreciate being considered for future work.", "On November 15, 1982 Engineer B notified Engineer A that Engineer B was going to terminate Engineer A because of lack of work." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 171 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:51:15.274784"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 171 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
171
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00
First case
171
Generated
2026-03-02T14:31:39.785898+00:00
Attributed to
Case 171 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:51:15.274784
Generated by
ProEthica Case 171 Extraction