Contractor Cross-Side Retention of Engineer A in Same Dam Failure Matter

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/170#Contractor_Cross-Side_Retention_of_Engineer_A_in_Same_Dam_Failure_Matter
Properties
Instance of
Same-ProceedingCross-SideEngagementProhibitionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Same-ProceedingCross-SideEngagementProhibitionState
Active period
From the moment the contractor retains Engineer A onward; the prohibition is immediate and absolute upon the cross-side engagement being proposed or accepted
Affected parties
Contractor (new adverse client)
Engineer A
U.S. Government (original client)
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's acceptance of retention by the contractor — the opposing party in the same dam failure matter — after having served the U.S. government in the same investigation
Terminated by
Engineer A declining the engagement, or full resolution of the contractor's claim against the government
Triggering event
Contractor files a claim against the U.S. government and retains Engineer A — the same engineer who investigated the dam failure for the government — to support that claim
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Later Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation

Text references
Later Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation
TTL
@prefix case170: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/170#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case170:Contractor_Cross-Side_Retention_of_Engineer_A_in_Same_Dam_Failure_Matter a proeth:Same-ProceedingCross-SideEngagementProhibitionState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Contractor Cross-Side Retention of Engineer A in Same Dam Failure Matter" ; proeth:activeperiod "From the moment the contractor retains Engineer A onward; the prohibition is immediate and absolute upon the cross-side engagement being proposed or accepted" ; proeth:affectedparties "Contractor (new adverse client)", "Engineer A", "U.S. Government (original client)" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.95" ; proeth:discoveredincase "170" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T20:58:37.654770+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "170" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T20:58:37.654770+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:sourcetext "Later Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation" ; proeth:stateclass "Same-Proceeding Cross-Side Engagement Prohibition State" ; proeth:subject "Engineer A's acceptance of retention by the contractor — the opposing party in the same dam failure matter — after having served the U.S. government in the same investigation" ; proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A declining the engagement, or full resolution of the contractor's claim against the government" ; proeth:textreferences "Later Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation" ; proeth:triggeringevent "Contractor files a claim against the U.S. government and retains Engineer A — the same engineer who investigated the dam failure for the government — to support that claim" ; proeth:urgencylevel "high" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 170 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T21:17:58.656756"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 170 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
170
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T20:58:37.654770+00:00
First case
170
Generated
2026-03-01T20:58:37.654770+00:00
Attributed to
Case 170 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T21:17:58.656756
Generated by
ProEthica Case 170 Extraction