Contractor Adverse Claim Client

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/170#Contractor_Adverse_Claim_Client
Definition

Filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation on the dam project; subsequently retained Engineer A — who had previously been engaged by the U.S. government to investigate the same dam failure — to support its claim, triggering a conflict of interest obligation for Engineer A to decline or withdraw.

Properties
Instance of
ContractorAdverseClaimForensicRetainingClient
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ContractorAdverseClaimForensicRetainingClient
Attributes
entity_typeConstruction contractor
claim_typeAdditional compensation claim against U.S. government
conflict_triggerRetaining engineer previously engaged by adverse party on same matter
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
typeadverse_to
targetU.S. Government Dam Failure Investigation Client
typeretained_engineer
targetEngineer A Dam Failure Forensic Investigation Engineer
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation

Text references
Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation
TTL
@prefix case170: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/170#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case170:Contractor_Adverse_Claim_Client a proeth:ContractorAdverseClaimForensicRetainingClient, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Contractor Adverse Claim Client" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case170:Switching_Sides_Prohibition_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Dam_Failure_Forensic_Investigation ; proeth:attributes "{'entity_type': 'Construction contractor', 'claim_type': 'Additional compensation claim against U.S. government', 'conflict_trigger': 'Retaining engineer previously engaged by adverse party on same matter'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation on the dam project; subsequently retained Engineer A — who had previously been engaged by the U.S. government to investigate the same dam failure — to support its claim, triggering a conflict of interest obligation for Engineer A to decline or withdraw." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:discoveredincase "170" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T20:58:31.969089+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "170" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T20:58:31.969089+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'adverse_to', 'target': 'U.S. Government Dam Failure Investigation Client'}", "{'type': 'retained_engineer', 'target': 'Engineer A Dam Failure Forensic Investigation Engineer'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Contractor Adverse Claim Forensic Retaining Client" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is retained by the contractor on this project, who has filed a claim against the U.S. government for additional compensation" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 170 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T21:17:58.658138"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 170 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
170
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T20:58:31.969089+00:00
First case
170
Generated
2026-03-01T20:58:31.969089+00:00
Attributed to
Case 170 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T21:17:58.658138
Generated by
ProEthica Case 170 Extraction