Reviewing Engineer Employment Through Predecessor Criticism Context
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Reviewing_Engineer_Employment_Through_Predecessor_Criticism_Context
Properties
Instance of
ReviewingEngineerEmploymentAcquisitionThroughPredecessorCriticismState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ReviewingEngineerEmploymentAcquisitionThroughPredecessorCriticismState
Active period
From the new owner's decision to retain Engineer B through the ethics board's analysis
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
New Owner
Confidence
0.89
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer B's acquisition of the inspection engagement in the context of dissatisfaction with Engineer A's original design
Terminated by
Ethics board's ruling that Engineer B's method of obtaining employment was not improper
Triggering event
New owner's commissioning of Engineer B to inspect and assess the facility following identification of alleged design inadequacies
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility
Text references
Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility
there is no showing that Engineer B had undertaken his review and subsequent report with the intent to injure the professional reputation or practice of Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Reviewing_Engineer_Employment_Through_Predecessor_Criticism_Context a proeth:ReviewingEngineerEmploymentAcquisitionThroughPredecessorCriticismState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Reviewing Engineer Employment Through Predecessor Criticism Context" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the new owner's decision to retain Engineer B through the ethics board's analysis" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"New Owner" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility" ;
proeth:stateclass "Reviewing Engineer Employment Acquisition Through Predecessor Criticism State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer B's acquisition of the inspection engagement in the context of dissatisfaction with Engineer A's original design" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Ethics board's ruling that Engineer B's method of obtaining employment was not improper" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility",
"there is no showing that Engineer B had undertaken his review and subsequent report with the intent to injure the professional reputation or practice of Engineer A" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "New owner's commissioning of Engineer B to inspect and assess the facility following identification of alleged design inadequacies" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.039849"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.039849
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction