Peer_Review_Without_Notification_Standard_Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Peer_Review_Without_Notification_Standard_Instance
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewWithoutNotificationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewWithoutNotificationStandard
Confidence
0.92
Created by
NSPE professional norms and engineering registration board rules
Document title
Professional Norm: Engineer Review of Another Engineer's Work Without Notification
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A in framing the misconduct complaint; BER in evaluating Engineer B's conduct
Used in context
Engineer A alleged that Engineer B acted improperly by reviewing and criticizing Engineer A's original design work without Engineer A's knowledge, raising the question of whether Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before conducting the inspection and filing the report
Version
N/A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge
Text references
Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Peer_Review_Without_Notification_Standard_Instance a proeth:PeerReviewWithoutNotificationStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Peer_Review_Without_Notification_Standard_Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE professional norms and engineering registration board rules" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional Norm: Engineer Review of Another Engineer's Work Without Notification" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:12:07.657759+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:12:07.657759+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Peer Review Without Notification Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A in framing the misconduct complaint; BER in evaluating Engineer B's conduct" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Engineer A alleged that Engineer B acted improperly by reviewing and criticizing Engineer A's original design work without Engineer A's knowledge, raising the question of whether Engineer B was obligated to notify Engineer A before conducting the inspection and filing the report" ;
proeth:version "N/A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.033444"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:12:07.657759+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:12:07.657759+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.033444
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction