Engineer B Review Without Malicious Intent
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Review_Without_Malicious_Intent
Properties
Instance of
ReviewWithoutMaliciousIntentConfirmedState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ReviewWithoutMaliciousIntentConfirmedState
Active period
Throughout Engineer B's review engagement and report preparation
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
New Owner
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer B's motivational state in conducting the review and preparing the report
Terminated by
Ethics board's affirmative finding that no malicious intent was shown
Triggering event
Ethics board's evaluation of the information submitted regarding Engineer B's conduct
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
there is no showing that Engineer B had undertaken his review and subsequent report with the intent to injure the professional reputation or practice of Engineer A
Text references
The fact that Engineer B concluded that some changes were needed in the equipment originally specified cannot alone constitute the kind of actions barred by 12
there is no showing that Engineer B had undertaken his review and subsequent report with the intent to injure the professional reputation or practice of Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Review_Without_Malicious_Intent a proeth:ReviewWithoutMaliciousIntentConfirmedState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Review Without Malicious Intent" ;
proeth:activeperiod "Throughout Engineer B's review engagement and report preparation" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"New Owner" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "there is no showing that Engineer B had undertaken his review and subsequent report with the intent to injure the professional reputation or practice of Engineer A" ;
proeth:stateclass "Review Without Malicious Intent Confirmed State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer B's motivational state in conducting the review and preparing the report" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Ethics board's affirmative finding that no malicious intent was shown" ;
proeth:textreferences "The fact that Engineer B concluded that some changes were needed in the equipment originally specified cannot alone constitute the kind of actions barred by 12",
"there is no showing that Engineer B had undertaken his review and subsequent report with the intent to injure the professional reputation or practice of Engineer A" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Ethics board's evaluation of the information submitted regarding Engineer B's conduct" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.039171"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:14:19.467783+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.039171
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction