Engineer A Reputational Harm from Predecessor Design Criticism
Individual
a6bbd39f
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_A_Reputational_Harm_from_Predecessor_Design_Criticism
Properties
Parent
Activeperiod
From Engineer B's report through registration board proceedings
Affectedparties
Engineer A
Engineer B
State engineering registration board
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.72
Importance
medium
Stateclass
Conflict of Interest State
Subject
Engineer A's professional reputation and standing, implicated by Engineer B's report identifying design inadequacies
Terminatedby
Registration board determination (pending)
Triggeringevent
Engineer B's report concluding there were design inadequacies in Engineer A's original work
Urgencylevel
medium
Source Evidence
Source Text
further alleged that the actions of Engineer B were self-serving at the expense of the dignity and reputation of Engineer A
Text References
Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct'
further alleged that the actions of Engineer B were self-serving at the expense of the dignity and reputation of Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_A_Reputational_Harm_from_Predecessor_Design_Criticism> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Reputational Harm from Predecessor Design Criticism" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictofInterestState> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
a6bbd39f45862899...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
169
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T22:12:57.640328+00:00
First Case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:12:57.640328+00:00
Attributed To
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.037162
Generated By
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction