Engineer A Original MEP Design Engineer
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_A_Original_MEP_Design_Engineer
Definition
Provided mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project as a sub-consultant to the prime PE; was fully paid; years later became subject of a post-occupancy inspection report identifying design inadequacies in hot water and heating equipment sizing; filed a complaint with the state registration board against Engineer B alleging improper, non-objective, and self-serving conduct.
Properties
Instance of
OriginalMEPDesignEngineerSubjecttoPost-OccupancyCritique
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#OriginalMEPDesignEngineerSubjecttoPost-OccupancyCritique
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| specialty | Mechanical and Electrical Engineering |
| engagement_type | Sub-consultant to prime PE |
| complaint_filer | True |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | complaint_filer_against |
| target | Engineer B |
| type | joint_inspection_participant_with |
| target | City Wiring Inspector |
| type | joint_inspection_participant_with |
| target | Engineer B |
| type | sub-consultant_to |
| target | Prime Professional Engineer |
| type | subject_of_review_by |
| target | Engineer B |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A had been retained by the prime professional engineer to provide mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project
Text references
Engineer A had been retained by the prime professional engineer to provide mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project
Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge
Engineer A thereafter filed a complaint with the state engineering registration board alleging that Engineer B had acted improperly
Engineer A was fully paid for his services
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_A_Original_MEP_Design_Engineer a proeth:OriginalMEPDesignEngineerSubjecttoPost-OccupancyCritique,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Original MEP Design Engineer" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case169:Non-Obstruction_of_Legitimate_Peer_Review_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Knowledge_of_Engineer_B_Retention,
case169:Professional_Dignity_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Interest_in_Review_Notification ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case169:Engineer_A_Non-Obstruction_of_Legitimate_Peer_Review_Violated_by_Complaint_Filing ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'specialty': 'Mechanical and Electrical Engineering', 'engagement_type': 'Sub-consultant to prime PE', 'complaint_filer': True}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Provided mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project as a sub-consultant to the prime PE; was fully paid; years later became subject of a post-occupancy inspection report identifying design inadequacies in hot water and heating equipment sizing; filed a complaint with the state registration board against Engineer B alleging improper, non-objective, and self-serving conduct." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'complaint_filer_against', 'target': 'Engineer B'}",
"{'type': 'joint_inspection_participant_with', 'target': 'City Wiring Inspector'}",
"{'type': 'joint_inspection_participant_with', 'target': 'Engineer B'}",
"{'type': 'sub-consultant_to', 'target': 'Prime Professional Engineer'}",
"{'type': 'subject_of_review_by', 'target': 'Engineer B'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Original MEP Design Engineer Subject to Post-Occupancy Critique" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A had been retained by the prime professional engineer to provide mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A had been retained by the prime professional engineer to provide mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project",
"Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge",
"Engineer A thereafter filed a complaint with the state engineering registration board alleging that Engineer B had acted improperly",
"Engineer A was fully paid for his services" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.034816"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.034816
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction