Engineer A Original MEP Design Engineer
Individual
07329f5e
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_A_Original_MEP_Design_Engineer
Definition
Provided mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project as a sub-consultant to the prime PE; was fully paid; years later became subject of a post-occupancy inspection report identifying design inadequacies in hot water and heating equipment sizing; filed a complaint with the state registration board against Engineer B alleging improper, non-objective, and self-serving conduct.
Properties
Parent
OriginalMEPDesignEngineerSubjecttoPost-OccupancyCritique
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#OriginalMEPDesignEngineerSubjecttoPost-OccupancyCritique
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| specialty | Mechanical and Electrical Engineering |
| engagement_type | Sub-consultant to prime PE |
| complaint_filer | True |
Concept Category
Role
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | complaint_filer_against |
| target | Engineer B |
| type | joint_inspection_participant_with |
| target | City Wiring Inspector |
| type | joint_inspection_participant_with |
| target | Engineer B |
| type | sub-consultant_to |
| target | Prime Professional Engineer |
| type | subject_of_review_by |
| target | Engineer B |
Role Category
provider_client
Role Class
Original MEP Design Engineer Subject to Post-Occupancy Critique
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A had been retained by the prime professional engineer to provide mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project
Text References
Engineer A had been retained by the prime professional engineer to provide mechanical and electrical engineering services for a large housing project
Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge
Engineer A thereafter filed a complaint with the state engineering registration board alleging that Engineer B had acted improperly
Engineer A was fully paid for his services
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_A_Original_MEP_Design_Engineer> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Original MEP Design Engineer" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#OriginalMEPDesignEngineerSubjecttoPost-OccupancyCritique> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
07329f5e8a58379c...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
169
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00
First Case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00
Attributed To
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.034816
Generated By
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction