BER-Case-68-11
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#BER-Case-68-11
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.97
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 68-11
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review as analogical precedent supporting the current ruling
Used in context
Cited alongside Case 68-6 as prior precedent clarifying the purpose and scope of Section 12(a) regarding peer review notification obligations
Version
1968
Source Evidence
Source text
It may be helpful for future guidance to again point out that the purpose of 12(a) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer the opportunity to submit his comments or explanation for his technical decisions... (See Cases Nos. 68-6 and 68-11.)
Text references
It may be helpful for future guidance to again point out that the purpose of 12(a) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer the opportunity to submit his comments or explanation for his technical decisions... (See Cases Nos. 68-6 and 68-11.)
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:BER-Case-68-11 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-68-11" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 68-11" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:13:29.671161+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:13:29.671161+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "It may be helpful for future guidance to again point out that the purpose of 12(a) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer the opportunity to submit his comments or explanation for his technical decisions... (See Cases Nos. 68-6 and 68-11.)" ;
proeth:textreferences "It may be helpful for future guidance to again point out that the purpose of 12(a) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer the opportunity to submit his comments or explanation for his technical decisions... (See Cases Nos. 68-6 and 68-11.)" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review as analogical precedent supporting the current ruling" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Cited alongside Case 68-6 as prior precedent clarifying the purpose and scope of Section 12(a) regarding peer review notification obligations" ;
proeth:version "1968" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.037985"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:13:29.671161+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:13:29.671161+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.037985
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction