Prohibition on Reputation Injury Invoked Against Both Parties' Capability Disparagement
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#Prohibition_on_Reputation_Injury_Invoked_Against_Both_Parties_Capability_Disparagement
Properties
Instance of
ProhibitiononReputationInjuryThroughCompetitiveCritique
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProhibitiononReputationInjuryThroughCompetitiveCritique
Applied to
All adverse capability comments made by either party to former clients of Engineer A
Balancing with
Free and Open Competition as Engineering Ethics Boundary Condition
Self-Interest-Tainted Adverse Peer Critique Prohibition
Concrete expression
Both Engineer A's adverse comments about Firm B's capability and Firm B engineers' adverse comments about Engineer A's capability constituted affronts to the ethics code prohibition on injuring another engineer's professional reputation, prospects, and practice
Confidence
0.96
Importance
high
Interpretation
The prohibition on reputation injury through competitive critique applies to all adverse comments about a competitor's professional capacity made in the context of competitive solicitation, regardless of which party initiated the exchange
Invoked by
Engineer A Mutual Disparagement Competing Engineer
Firm B Engineers Mutual Disparagement Competing Engineer
Tension resolution
The prohibition on reputation injury constrains the manner of competition even where competition itself is permissible; free and open competition does not authorize disparagement of competitors
Source Evidence
Source text
The charge and counter-charge by both A and B regarding the capability of the other to provide adequate or quality services are both affronts to §12.
Text references
Both sides were in clear error by indulging in criticisms of the other when, as here, the aspersions were cast purely in terms of attempting to secure a personal benefit
The charge and counter-charge by both A and B regarding the capability of the other to provide adequate or quality services are both affronts to §12.
TTL
@prefix case168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case168:Prohibition_on_Reputation_Injury_Invoked_Against_Both_Parties_Capability_Disparagement a proeth:ProhibitiononReputationInjuryThroughCompetitiveCritique,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Prohibition on Reputation Injury Invoked Against Both Parties' Capability Disparagement" ;
proeth:appliedto "All adverse capability comments made by either party to former clients of Engineer A" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Free and Open Competition as Engineering Ethics Boundary Condition",
"Self-Interest-Tainted Adverse Peer Critique Prohibition" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Both Engineer A's adverse comments about Firm B's capability and Firm B engineers' adverse comments about Engineer A's capability constituted affronts to the ethics code prohibition on injuring another engineer's professional reputation, prospects, and practice" ;
proeth:confidence "0.96" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:46:59.536015+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:46:59.536015+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The prohibition on reputation injury through competitive critique applies to all adverse comments about a competitor's professional capacity made in the context of competitive solicitation, regardless of which party initiated the exchange" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Mutual Disparagement Competing Engineer",
"Firm B Engineers Mutual Disparagement Competing Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Prohibition on Reputation Injury Through Competitive Critique" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The charge and counter-charge by both A and B regarding the capability of the other to provide adequate or quality services are both affronts to §12." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The prohibition on reputation injury constrains the manner of competition even where competition itself is permissible; free and open competition does not authorize disparagement of competitors" ;
proeth:textreferences "Both sides were in clear error by indulging in criticisms of the other when, as here, the aspersions were cast purely in terms of attempting to secure a personal benefit",
"The charge and counter-charge by both A and B regarding the capability of the other to provide adequate or quality services are both affronts to §12." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 168 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:59:28.930647"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 168 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
168
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:46:59.536015+00:00
First case
168
Generated
2026-03-02T02:46:59.536015+00:00
Attributed to
Case 168 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:59:28.930647
Generated by
ProEthica Case 168 Extraction