Former Clients of Firm A
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#Former_Clients_of_Firm_A
Definition
Former clients of Firm A, some with projects under active discussion, who were contacted by both Firm B (with disparaging remarks about Firm A) and Engineer A (with disparaging remarks about Firm B), and who relayed Firm B's disparaging statements back to Engineer A.
Properties
Instance of
EngineeringServicesClientTargetedbyCompetitorDisparagement
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineeringServicesClientTargetedbyCompetitorDisparagement
Attributes
| relationship_status | Former clients; some with pending projects under discussion |
| role_in_case | Recipients of competing solicitations and disparaging communications |
Confidence
0.88
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | contacted_by |
| target | Engineer A |
| type | former_client_of |
| target | Firm A / Engineer A |
| type | solicited_by |
| target | Firm B / Four Departing Engineers |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A
Text references
Engineer A was also making contact with the former clients
Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A
he was told by the clients that Firm B had cast doubt on the ability of A to provide quality services
TTL
@prefix case168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case168:Former_Clients_of_Firm_A a proeth:EngineeringServicesClientTargetedbyCompetitorDisparagement,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Former Clients of Firm A" ;
proeth:attributes "{'relationship_status': 'Former clients; some with pending projects under discussion', 'role_in_case': 'Recipients of competing solicitations and disparaging communications'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Former clients of Firm A, some with projects under active discussion, who were contacted by both Firm B (with disparaging remarks about Firm A) and Engineer A (with disparaging remarks about Firm B), and who relayed Firm B's disparaging statements back to Engineer A." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:36:49.881792+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:36:49.881792+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'contacted_by', 'target': 'Engineer A'}",
"{'type': 'former_client_of', 'target': 'Firm A / Engineer A'}",
"{'type': 'solicited_by', 'target': 'Firm B / Four Departing Engineers'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Engineering Services Client Targeted by Competitor Disparagement" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A was also making contact with the former clients",
"Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A",
"he was told by the clients that Firm B had cast doubt on the ability of A to provide quality services" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 168 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:59:28.916340"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 168 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
168
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:36:49.881792+00:00
First case
168
Generated
2026-03-02T02:36:49.881792+00:00
Attributed to
Case 168 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:59:28.916340
Generated by
ProEthica Case 168 Extraction