Firm B Supplanting Allegation Against Departing Engineers
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#Firm_B_Supplanting_Allegation_Against_Departing_Engineers
Properties
Instance of
Post-DepartureFormerClientSolicitationSupplantingAllegationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-DepartureFormerClientSolicitationSupplantingAllegationState
Active period
From the moment Firm B contacted former Firm A clients through resolution of the ethical dispute
Affected parties
Engineer A
Firm A
Firm B
Former clients of Firm A
Four departed engineers
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Competitive relationship between Firm A (Engineer A) and Firm B (four departed engineers)
Terminated by
Not yet terminated — ongoing ethical dispute
Triggering event
Firm B's prompt contact with former Firm A clients, including those with projects under discussion but not formally awarded
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A, but for which specific selection or negotiation had not taken place
Text references
Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting
Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A, but for which specific selection or negotiation had not taken place
TTL
@prefix case168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case168:Firm_B_Supplanting_Allegation_Against_Departing_Engineers a proeth:Post-DepartureFormerClientSolicitationSupplantingAllegationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Firm B Supplanting Allegation Against Departing Engineers" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the moment Firm B contacted former Firm A clients through resolution of the ethical dispute" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer A",
"Firm A",
"Firm B",
"Former clients of Firm A",
"Four departed engineers" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:37:30.453400+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:37:30.453400+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A, but for which specific selection or negotiation had not taken place" ;
proeth:stateclass "Post-Departure Former Client Solicitation Supplanting Allegation State" ;
proeth:subject "Competitive relationship between Firm A (Engineer A) and Firm B (four departed engineers)" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not yet terminated — ongoing ethical dispute" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting",
"Firm B promptly contacted the former clients of Firm A, including some former clients of Firm A which had projects under discussion with Firm A, but for which specific selection or negotiation had not taken place" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Firm B's prompt contact with former Firm A clients, including those with projects under discussion but not formally awarded" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 168 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:59:28.916595"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 168 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
168
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:30.453400+00:00
First case
168
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:30.453400+00:00
Attributed to
Case 168 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:59:28.916595
Generated by
ProEthica Case 168 Extraction