Engineer A Incumbent Firm Principal

@prefix case168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case168:Engineer_A_Incumbent_Firm_Principal a proeth:IncumbentFirmPrincipalDefendingAgainstCompetitorDisparagement, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Incumbent Firm Principal" ; proeth-core:hasObligation case168:Engineer_A_Supplanting_Protest_Competitive_Motivation_Non-Weaponization, case168:Firm_B_Competitive_Solicitation_Motivation_Transparency_Reporting_Context ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'position': 'Firm Principal / Head', 'firm': 'Firm A'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Head of original engineering firm who lost four key engineers to a competing firm; contacted former clients to reassure them of continued capacity while also casting doubt on Firm B's qualifications, and formally protested the departing engineers' conduct as a violation of the supplanting rule." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:discoveredincase "168" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:36:49.881792+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "168" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:36:49.881792+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'competitor_to', 'target': 'Firm B'}", "{'type': 'former_employer_of', 'target': 'Four Departing Engineers'}", "{'type': 'service_provider_to', 'target': 'Former Clients of Firm A'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Incumbent Firm Principal Defending Against Competitor Disparagement" ; proeth:sourcetext "a firm headed by Engineer A" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds", "Engineer A indicated doubt that Firm B was qualified to provide quality services", "Engineer A was also making contact with the former clients to indicate that his firm was still available for future commissions", "a firm headed by Engineer A" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 168 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:59:28.915871"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 168 Extraction" .