BER_Case_76-5
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#BER_Case_76-5
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.98
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 76-5
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review to resolve the supplanting charge
Used in context
Most recently cited precedent establishing the two-part test for the supplanting rule: the complaining engineer must either have a contract for the work or have been selected for negotiation for the particular work
Version
1976
Source Evidence
Source text
As most recently stated in Case 76-5, '…for the supplanting standard to apply the facts must demonstrate that the complaining engineer either had a contract for the work, or had been selected for negotiation by the client for the particular work…'
Text references
As most recently stated in Case 76-5, '…for the supplanting standard to apply the facts must demonstrate that the complaining engineer either had a contract for the work, or had been selected for negotiation by the client for the particular work…'
TTL
@prefix case168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case168:BER_Case_76-5 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER_Case_76-5" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.98" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case 76-5" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:38:14.801876+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:38:14.801876+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "As most recently stated in Case 76-5, '…for the supplanting standard to apply the facts must demonstrate that the complaining engineer either had a contract for the work, or had been selected for negotiation by the client for the particular work…'" ;
proeth:textreferences "As most recently stated in Case 76-5, '…for the supplanting standard to apply the facts must demonstrate that the complaining engineer either had a contract for the work, or had been selected for negotiation by the client for the particular work…'" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review to resolve the supplanting charge" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Most recently cited precedent establishing the two-part test for the supplanting rule: the complaining engineer must either have a contract for the work or have been selected for negotiation for the particular work" ;
proeth:version "1976" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 168 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:59:28.918232"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 168 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
168
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:38:14.801876+00:00
First case
168
Generated
2026-03-02T02:38:14.801876+00:00
Attributed to
Case 168 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:59:28.918232
Generated by
ProEthica Case 168 Extraction