BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.78
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Prior Cases on Engineer Competition and Client Solicitation
Importance
medium
Used by
BER in reasoning by analogy to resolve the ethical questions raised
Used in context
Provides analogical reasoning patterns for evaluating the ethics of post-departure client solicitation, the rule against supplanting, and mutual disparagement between competing engineering firms
Version
N/A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting
Text references
Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting
TTL
@prefix case168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case168:BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.78" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Prior Cases on Engineer Competition and Client Solicitation" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:36:23.891972+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "168" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:36:23.891972+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting" ;
proeth:usedby "BER in reasoning by analogy to resolve the ethical questions raised" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Provides analogical reasoning patterns for evaluating the ethics of post-departure client solicitation, the rule against supplanting, and mutual disparagement between competing engineering firms" ;
proeth:version "N/A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 168 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:59:28.915636"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 168 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
168
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:36:23.891972+00:00
First case
168
Generated
2026-03-02T02:36:23.891972+00:00
Attributed to
Case 168 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:59:28.915636
Generated by
ProEthica Case 168 Extraction