BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation
Individual
1efa96eb
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation
Properties
Parent
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.78
Createdby
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Documenttitle
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Prior Cases on Engineer Competition and Client Solicitation
Importance
medium
Resourceclass
BER Case Precedent
Usedby
BER in reasoning by analogy to resolve the ethical questions raised
Usedincontext
Provides analogical reasoning patterns for evaluating the ethics of post-departure client solicitation, the rule against supplanting, and mutual disparagement between competing engineering firms
Version
N/A
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting
Text References
Engineer A has protested the action of the four engineers on ethical grounds, alleging that they violated the rule against supplanting
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_168: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/168#BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER-Case-Precedent-Competition-Solicitation" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#BERCasePrecedent> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
1efa96eb3e6f64ae...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
168
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T02:36:23.891972+00:00
First Case
168
Generated
2026-03-02T02:36:23.891972+00:00
Attributed To
Case 168 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:59:28.915636
Generated By
ProEthica Case 168 Extraction