Roe Firm Foreign Official Corrupt Payment Prohibition Violation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/167#Roe_Firm_Foreign_Official_Corrupt_Payment_Prohibition_Violation
Properties
Instance of
ForeignOfficialCorruptPaymentProhibitionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ForeignOfficialCorruptPaymentProhibitionObligation
Case context
Core holding of the NSPE BER opinion: Section 11b prohibits offering gifts to secure work, and this prohibition applies to foreign government officials in foreign countries regardless of local law or custom.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Obligated party
Richard Roe / US Engineering Firm Seeking Foreign Government Contract
Obligation statement
Roe's firm was obligated to refrain from offering personal gifts to foreign government officials as a condition of obtaining the engineering contract, regardless of the legality of such gifts under foreign law and regardless of their status as established local practice.
Temporal scope
Throughout the contract negotiation and procurement process in the foreign country
Relationships
competesWith
Roe Firm Competit or Gift-Practice Non-Justification Compliance, Roe Firm No-Choice Defense Rejection Domestic Analogy, Roe Firm Situational Ethics Non-Practice Foreign Context
defeasibleUnder
Roe Firm Coercive Foreign Contract Conditioning, Roe Firm Foreign Contract Negotiation - International Ethics Applicability, Roe Local Custom Legality Invoked as Ethics Justification
prevailsOver
Roe Firm Competit or Gift-Practice Non-Justification Compliance, Roe Firm No-Choice Defense Rejection Domestic Analogy, Roe Firm Situational Ethics Non-Practice Foreign Context
derivedFromPrinciple
Gift-Giving to Secure Foreign Contract as Corrupt Payment Prohibition Violation
Source Evidence
Source text
There is no question under the factual situation that the gifts are a direct consideration for securing the work, and there is here no pretense about the intention of the foreign government officials.
Text references
Note: The following Code sections no longer exists: Code of Ethics --Section 11b--'He will not pay, or offer to pay, either directly or indirectly, and commission, political contribution, or a gift, or other consideration in order to secure work'
There is no question under the factual situation that the gifts are a direct consideration for securing the work, and there is here no pretense about the intention of the foreign government officials.
they would clearly be a violation of the code if offered in the United State.
TTL
@prefix case167: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/167#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case167:Roe_Firm_Foreign_Official_Corrupt_Payment_Prohibition_Violation a proeth:ForeignOfficialCorruptPaymentProhibitionObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Roe Firm Foreign Official Corrupt Payment Prohibition Violation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case167:Roe_Firm_Competitor_Gift-Practice_Non-Justification_Compliance,
case167:Roe_Firm_No-Choice_Defense_Rejection_Domestic_Analogy,
case167:Roe_Firm_Situational_Ethics_Non-Practice_Foreign_Context ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case167:Roe_Firm_Coercive_Foreign_Contract_Conditioning,
case167:Roe_Firm_Foreign_Contract_Negotiation_-_International_Ethics_Applicability,
case167:Roe_Local_Custom_Legality_Invoked_as_Ethics_Justification ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case167:Roe_Firm_Competitor_Gift-Practice_Non-Justification_Compliance,
case167:Roe_Firm_No-Choice_Defense_Rejection_Domestic_Analogy,
case167:Roe_Firm_Situational_Ethics_Non-Practice_Foreign_Context ;
proeth:casecontext "Core holding of the NSPE BER opinion: Section 11b prohibits offering gifts to secure work, and this prohibition applies to foreign government officials in foreign countries regardless of local law or custom." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case167:Gift-Giving_to_Secure_Foreign_Contract_as_Corrupt_Payment_Prohibition_Violation ;
proeth:discoveredincase "167" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T10:18:18.218286+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "167" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T10:18:18.218286+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Richard Roe / US Engineering Firm Seeking Foreign Government Contract" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Foreign Official Corrupt Payment Prohibition Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Roe's firm was obligated to refrain from offering personal gifts to foreign government officials as a condition of obtaining the engineering contract, regardless of the legality of such gifts under foreign law and regardless of their status as established local practice." ;
proeth:sourcetext "There is no question under the factual situation that the gifts are a direct consideration for securing the work, and there is here no pretense about the intention of the foreign government officials." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the contract negotiation and procurement process in the foreign country" ;
proeth:textreferences "Note: The following Code sections no longer exists: Code of Ethics --Section 11b--'He will not pay, or offer to pay, either directly or indirectly, and commission, political contribution, or a gift, or other consideration in order to secure work'",
"There is no question under the factual situation that the gifts are a direct consideration for securing the work, and there is here no pretense about the intention of the foreign government officials.",
"they would clearly be a violation of the code if offered in the United State." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 167 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T10:28:27.338080"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 167 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
167
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T10:18:18.218286+00:00
First case
167
Generated
2026-03-02T10:18:18.218286+00:00
Attributed to
Case 167 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T10:28:27.338080
Generated by
ProEthica Case 167 Extraction