First Ethics Board Ruling on Code Section 3(e) Exaggeration-Emphasis Boundary
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/166#First_Ethics_Board_Ruling_on_Code_Section_3e_Exaggeration-Emphasis_Boundary
Properties
Instance of
PreviouslyReservedEthicalQuestionDefinitivelyResolvedState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PreviouslyReservedEthicalQuestionDefinitivelyResolvedState
Active period
From initiation of this case through issuance of the board's ruling
Affected parties
Engineer Doe
Engineering profession
Prospective employers
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Ethics board's interpretive posture toward Code Section 3(e) prohibition on exaggerated qualification statements
Terminated by
Board's holding that 'exaggerated' applies only to deliberate untruths, not to emphasis on degree of experience
Triggering event
Absence of any previous decisions on Code Section 3(e) combined with Doe's case requiring a definitive ruling
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
In the absence of any previous decisions on this section of the code
Text references
In the absence of any previous decisions on this section of the code
We hold that the word 'exaggerated' in the code applies only to deliberate untruths of the facts of former employment rather than the emphasis placed on the degree of experience or other qualifications
TTL
@prefix case166: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/166#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case166:First_Ethics_Board_Ruling_on_Code_Section_3e_Exaggeration-Emphasis_Boundary a proeth:PreviouslyReservedEthicalQuestionDefinitivelyResolvedState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "First Ethics Board Ruling on Code Section 3(e) Exaggeration-Emphasis Boundary" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From initiation of this case through issuance of the board's ruling" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer Doe",
"Engineering profession",
"Prospective employers" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "166" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T11:33:33.583722+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "166" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T11:33:33.583722+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "In the absence of any previous decisions on this section of the code" ;
proeth:stateclass "Previously Reserved Ethical Question Definitively Resolved State" ;
proeth:subject "Ethics board's interpretive posture toward Code Section 3(e) prohibition on exaggerated qualification statements" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Board's holding that 'exaggerated' applies only to deliberate untruths, not to emphasis on degree of experience" ;
proeth:textreferences "In the absence of any previous decisions on this section of the code",
"We hold that the word 'exaggerated' in the code applies only to deliberate untruths of the facts of former employment rather than the emphasis placed on the degree of experience or other qualifications" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Absence of any previous decisions on Code Section 3(e) combined with Doe's case requiring a definitive ruling" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 166 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:50:25.428062"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 166 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
166
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T11:33:33.583722+00:00
First case
166
Generated
2026-03-02T11:33:33.583722+00:00
Attributed to
Case 166 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:50:25.428062
Generated by
ProEthica Case 166 Extraction