Engineer A Autonomous Vehicle Risk Assessment Active Participation Obligation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/165#Engineer_A_Autonomous_Vehicle_Risk_Assessment_Active_Participation_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
AutonomousVehicleRiskAssessmentActiveParticipationandConcernExpressionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AutonomousVehicleRiskAssessmentActiveParticipationandConcernExpressionObligation
Case context
Engineer A serves as a consultant to an automobile manufacturer and is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team evaluating crash-avoidance algorithm scenarios for a driverless vehicle operating system, including scenarios involving unavoidable harm to passengers or third parties.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.94
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (Present Case — Autonomous Vehicle)
Obligation statement
Engineer A is obligated to fully and actively participate as a member of the automobile manufacturer's engineering risk management team, clearly and unambiguously express all concerns regarding the safety of the proposed autonomous vehicle operating system, and explore additional technical options that could mitigate the identified risks.
Temporal scope
Throughout the risk assessment team's deliberations and before any deployment recommendation is finalized
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Autonomous Vehicle Harm Allocation Design Assignment
derivedFromPrinciple
Active Risk Assessment Team Participation Obligation Invoked by Engineer A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A has a responsibility to fully and actively participate as a member of the engineering risk management team, clearly and unambiguously express any and all concerns he has regarding the safety of the proposed autonomous vehicle operation system, and explore additional potential technical options that could mitigate the risks identified in the proposed autonomous vehicle operating system
Text references
Engineer A has a responsibility to fully and actively participate as a member of the engineering risk management team, clearly and unambiguously express any and all concerns he has regarding the safety of the proposed autonomous vehicle operation system, and explore additional potential technical options that could mitigate the risks identified in the proposed autonomous vehicle operating system
TTL
@prefix case165: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/165#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case165:Engineer_A_Autonomous_Vehicle_Risk_Assessment_Active_Participation_Obligation a proeth:AutonomousVehicleRiskAssessmentActiveParticipationandConcernExpressionObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Autonomous Vehicle Risk Assessment Active Participation Obligation" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case165:Autonomous_Vehicle_Harm_Allocation_Design_Assignment ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A serves as a consultant to an automobile manufacturer and is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team evaluating crash-avoidance algorithm scenarios for a driverless vehicle operating system, including scenarios involving unavoidable harm to passengers or third parties." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.94" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case165:Active_Risk_Assessment_Team_Participation_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "165" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T23:31:57.925931+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "165" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T23:31:57.925931+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (Present Case — Autonomous Vehicle)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Autonomous Vehicle Risk Assessment Active Participation and Concern Expression Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is obligated to fully and actively participate as a member of the automobile manufacturer's engineering risk management team, clearly and unambiguously express all concerns regarding the safety of the proposed autonomous vehicle operating system, and explore additional technical options that could mitigate the identified risks." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A has a responsibility to fully and actively participate as a member of the engineering risk management team, clearly and unambiguously express any and all concerns he has regarding the safety of the proposed autonomous vehicle operation system, and explore additional potential technical options that could mitigate the risks identified in the proposed autonomous vehicle operating system" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the risk assessment team's deliberations and before any deployment recommendation is finalized" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A has a responsibility to fully and actively participate as a member of the engineering risk management team, clearly and unambiguously express any and all concerns he has regarding the safety of the proposed autonomous vehicle operation system, and explore additional potential technical options that could mitigate the risks identified in the proposed autonomous vehicle operating system" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 165 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T23:40:57.924562"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 165 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
165
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T23:31:57.925931+00:00
First case
165
Generated
2026-02-27T23:31:57.925931+00:00
Attributed to
Case 165 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T23:40:57.924562
Generated by
ProEthica Case 165 Extraction