Engineer A AV Further Study Recommendation Before Deployment Obligation

@prefix case165: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/165#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case165:Engineer_A_AV_Further_Study_Recommendation_Before_Deployment_Obligation a proeth:AutonomousVehicleFurtherStudyRecommendationBeforeDeploymentObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A AV Further Study Recommendation Before Deployment Obligation" ; proeth-core:competesWith case165:Engineer_A_AV_Faithful_Agent_Informed_Decision_Enablement_Obligation ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case165:Autonomous_Vehicle_Ethics_Regulatory_Standards_Vacuum, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/165#Engineer_A_Ethical_Dilemma_—_Harm_Allocation_Recommendation> ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case165:Engineer_A_AV_Faithful_Agent_Informed_Decision_Enablement_Obligation ; proeth:casecontext "The risk assessment team is evaluating a scenario involving unavoidable crashes where the algorithm must choose between passenger safety and third-party harm minimization — a question with unresolved ethical dimensions that may require further study before deployment." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case165:Do_No_Harm_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_in_Autonomous_Vehicle_Case, case165:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_in_Autonomous_Vehicle_Risk_Assessment ; proeth:discoveredincase "165" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T23:27:21.726838+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "165" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T23:27:21.726838+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Autonomous Vehicle Further Study Recommendation Before Deployment Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A, as a member of the automobile manufacturer's engineering risk assessment team, was obligated to recommend that further study be conducted before the autonomous vehicle operating system is deployed for public use, if material ethical, safety, or technical questions regarding the crash-avoidance algorithm's harm-distribution logic remained unresolved at the time of the team's recommendation." ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team whose members are being asked to make a recommendation relating to potential situations that could arise in connection with the operation of driverless/autonomous vehicles" ; proeth:temporalscope "At the time of preparing and delivering the risk assessment team's recommendation to the automobile manufacturer, if unresolved questions remain" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is assigned to an engineering risk assessment team whose members are being asked to make a recommendation relating to potential situations that could arise in connection with the operation of driverless/autonomous vehicles", "In the event of an unavoidable crash, does the vehicle's system choose the outcome that will likely result in the greatest potential for safety for the vehicle's passengers or does the vehicle's software system instead choose an option in which the least amount of potential harm is done to any of those involved in an accident" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 165 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T23:40:57.918661"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 165 Extraction" .