Utility Authority QBS Public Welfare Paramount Most Qualified Firm Selection
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Utility_Authority_QBS_Public_Welfare_Paramount_Most_Qualified_Firm_Selection
Properties
Instance of
ProcurementLawComplianceObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProcurementLawComplianceObligation
Case context
The QBS process was designed to select the most qualified firm for a large and complex power facility addition. The authority's decision to allow amendment of qualification submissions, after legal clearance and with equal treatment for all competitors, served the public welfare objective of ensuring the most qualified firm was ultimately selected.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Utility Authority (QBS Procurement Administering Public Utility Authority)
Obligation statement
The utility authority was obligated to administer the QBS process with the paramount goal of selecting the most qualified firm for the large and complex power facility addition, ensuring that procedural decisions — including the grant of the equal amendment opportunity — served the public welfare objective of obtaining the highest quality engineering services for the project.
Temporal scope
Throughout the QBS procurement process
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Public Welfare Paramount Invoked by QBS Process Design for Complex Power Facility
Source Evidence
Source text
A public utility authority announced plans to build a large and complex addition to its power facilities, and publicly invited qualification statements from interested engineering firms.
Text references
A public utility authority announced plans to build a large and complex addition to its power facilities, and publicly invited qualification statements from interested engineering firms.
Following these interviews, the agency is required to select the 'most qualified' firm for negotiation of a contract.
The utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A and a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it.
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Utility_Authority_QBS_Public_Welfare_Paramount_Most_Qualified_Firm_Selection a proeth:ProcurementLawComplianceObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Utility Authority QBS Public Welfare Paramount Most Qualified Firm Selection" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case162:Utility_Authority_QBS_Procurement_Law_Conformance_in_Administering_Selection_Process ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case162:Competitive_Procurement_Public_Interest_Framework_for_Power_Facility ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case162:Public_and_City_Council_Objectors_Procurement_Spirit_Intent_Protest_Proportionality ;
proeth:casecontext "The QBS process was designed to select the most qualified firm for a large and complex power facility addition. The authority's decision to allow amendment of qualification submissions, after legal clearance and with equal treatment for all competitors, served the public welfare objective of ensuring the most qualified firm was ultimately selected." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case162:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_by_QBS_Process_Design_for_Complex_Power_Facility ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Utility Authority (QBS Procurement Administering Public Utility Authority)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Procurement Law Compliance Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The utility authority was obligated to administer the QBS process with the paramount goal of selecting the most qualified firm for the large and complex power facility addition, ensuring that procedural decisions — including the grant of the equal amendment opportunity — served the public welfare objective of obtaining the highest quality engineering services for the project." ;
proeth:sourcetext "A public utility authority announced plans to build a large and complex addition to its power facilities, and publicly invited qualification statements from interested engineering firms." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the QBS procurement process" ;
proeth:textreferences "A public utility authority announced plans to build a large and complex addition to its power facilities, and publicly invited qualification statements from interested engineering firms.",
"Following these interviews, the agency is required to select the 'most qualified' firm for negotiation of a contract.",
"The utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A and a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.179534"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:42:35.118506+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.179534
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction