SOQ Amendment and Modification Procedure Standard (Joint Venture Team Revision)
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#SOQ_Amendment_and_Modification_Procedure_Standard_Joint_Venture_Team_Revision
Properties
Instance of
SOQAmendmentandModificationProcedureStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SOQAmendmentandModificationProcedureStandard
Confidence
0.88
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / professional procurement ethics norms
Document title
SOQ Amendment and Modification Procedure Standard – Joint Venture Team Composition Revision
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review in assessing fairness of mid-process joint venture team revision
Used in context
The ethical permissibility of Firm A revising its joint venture team composition in response to screening committee feedback, conditioned on all competing firms receiving the same opportunity to amend
Version
Applied in this case context
Source Evidence
Source text
We do not see any basis to question the fairness of such a procedure when all competing firms are given the same opportunity.
Text references
We do not see any basis to question the fairness of such a procedure when all competing firms are given the same opportunity.
whether it is fair to allow a competing firm to revise the elements making up the team of its joint venture in order to meet a higher level of qualification on the basis of public comments made by the screening committee
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:SOQ_Amendment_and_Modification_Procedure_Standard_Joint_Venture_Team_Revision a proeth:SOQAmendmentandModificationProcedureStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "SOQ Amendment and Modification Procedure Standard (Joint Venture Team Revision)" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review / professional procurement ethics norms" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "SOQ Amendment and Modification Procedure Standard – Joint Venture Team Composition Revision" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:38:09.660808+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:38:09.660808+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "SOQ Amendment and Modification Procedure Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "We do not see any basis to question the fairness of such a procedure when all competing firms are given the same opportunity." ;
proeth:textreferences "We do not see any basis to question the fairness of such a procedure when all competing firms are given the same opportunity.",
"whether it is fair to allow a competing firm to revise the elements making up the team of its joint venture in order to meet a higher level of qualification on the basis of public comments made by the screening committee" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review in assessing fairness of mid-process joint venture team revision" ;
proeth:usedincontext "The ethical permissibility of Firm A revising its joint venture team composition in response to screening committee feedback, conditioned on all competing firms receiving the same opportunity to amend" ;
proeth:version "Applied in this case context" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.174787"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:38:09.660808+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:38:09.660808+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.174787
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction