SOQ-Amendment-Modification-Procedure

Individual 920235a0
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#SOQ-Amendment-Modification-Procedure
Properties
Parent
SOQAmendmentandModificationProcedureStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SOQAmendmentandModificationProcedureStandard
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.85
Createdby
Procurement law, professional engineering ethics norms
Documenttitle
Standard for Post-Submission SOQ Amendment in Qualification-Based Selection Procurement
Importance
high
Resourceclass
SOQ Amendment and Modification Procedure Standard
Usedby
Firm A, utility authority screening committee, city council, public objectors
Usedincontext
The central procedural and ethical question of the case: whether Firm A was permitted to modify its qualification proposal after initial submission and after receiving informal feedback from the screening committee, and whether the utility authority acted properly in granting that request. This standard governs the permissibility and ethical implications of mid-process SOQ amendments.
Source Evidence
Source Text
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability to provide the total services needed to be selected for negotiations.
Text References
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability to provide the total services needed to be selected for negotiations.
Firm A requested the utility authority to allow it to modify its qualification statement and proposal in light of the change it had made in the team
The utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A and a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it.
some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal, alleging that in doing so it violated the intent of the governing procurement law
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#SOQ-Amendment-Modification-Procedure> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "SOQ-Amendment-Modification-Procedure" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SOQAmendmentandModificationProcedureStandard> .
Metadata
Ontology
proethica-case-162
Type
Individual
Content Hash
920235a0e095f9ce...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
162
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T02:36:20.464447+00:00
First Case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:36:20.464447+00:00
Attributed To
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.171699
Generated By
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction
Formats
TTL JSON