Public and City Council Procurement Objectors
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Public_and_City_Council_Procurement_Objectors
Definition
Members of the public and city council members who objected to the utility authority's decision to allow Firm A to amend its qualification statement, alleging both a violation of the intent of the governing procurement law and unethical conduct by Firm A in making the request.
Properties
Instance of
PublicProcurementObjectorStakeholder
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicProcurementObjectorStakeholder
Attributes
| objection_basis | Alleged violation of procurement law intent and unethical conduct by Firm A |
| forum | Public meeting and city council |
Confidence
0.85
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | alleges_misconduct_by |
| target | Firm A QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm |
| type | objects_to_decision_of |
| target | Utility Authority QBS Procurement Administrator |
Role category
public_responsibility
Source Evidence
Source text
some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal
Text references
alleging that in doing so it violated the intent of the governing procurement law
and that Firm A had acted unethically in making its request
some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Public_and_City_Council_Procurement_Objectors a proeth:PublicProcurementObjectorStakeholder,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Public and City Council Procurement Objectors" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case162:Procurement_Process_Spirit_and_Intent_Invoked_by_Public_Objectors ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case162:Public_and_City_Council_Objectors_Procurement_Spirit_Intent_Protest_Proportionality,
case162:Public_and_City_Council_Procurement_Objectors_Good_Faith_Protest_Proportionality_Assessment ;
proeth:attributes "{'objection_basis': 'Alleged violation of procurement law intent and unethical conduct by Firm A', 'forum': 'Public meeting and city council'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Members of the public and city council members who objected to the utility authority's decision to allow Firm A to amend its qualification statement, alleging both a violation of the intent of the governing procurement law and unethical conduct by Firm A in making the request." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'alleges_misconduct_by', 'target': 'Firm A QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm'}",
"{'type': 'objects_to_decision_of', 'target': 'Utility Authority QBS Procurement Administrator'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ;
proeth:roleclass "Public Procurement Objector Stakeholder" ;
proeth:sourcetext "some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal" ;
proeth:textreferences "alleging that in doing so it violated the intent of the governing procurement law",
"and that Firm A had acted unethically in making its request",
"some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.173962"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.173962
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction