New Joint Venture Partner Engineering Firm
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#New_Joint_Venture_Partner_Engineering_Firm
Definition
A new engineering firm (or firms) arranged by Firm A to join its joint venture team after the screening committee identified deficiencies in technical experience and specialized personnel backup, contributing the missing specialized expertise to strengthen the amended qualification submission.
Properties
Instance of
JointVenturePartnerEngineeringFirm
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#JointVenturePartnerEngineeringFirm
Attributes
| participation_trigger | Screening committee feedback identifying technical deficiencies |
| contribution | Specialized technical expertise and/or personnel backup previously lacking |
Confidence
0.8
Importance
medium
Relationships
| type | evaluated_by |
| target | Utility Authority QBS Procurement Administrator |
| type | joint_venture_with |
| target | Firm A QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm |
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability to provide the total services needed
Text references
Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability to provide the total services needed
the change it had made in the team
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:New_Joint_Venture_Partner_Engineering_Firm a proeth:JointVenturePartnerEngineeringFirm,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "New Joint Venture Partner Engineering Firm" ;
proeth:attributes "{'participation_trigger': 'Screening committee feedback identifying technical deficiencies', 'contribution': 'Specialized technical expertise and/or personnel backup previously lacking'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "A new engineering firm (or firms) arranged by Firm A to join its joint venture team after the screening committee identified deficiencies in technical experience and specialized personnel backup, contributing the missing specialized expertise to strengthen the amended qualification submission." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.8" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'evaluated_by', 'target': 'Utility Authority QBS Procurement Administrator'}",
"{'type': 'joint_venture_with', 'target': 'Firm A QBS Qualification Amendment Requesting Engineering Firm'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Joint Venture Partner Engineering Firm" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability to provide the total services needed" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firm A proceeded to arrange for other participation as part of the joint venture to overcome the apparent deficiencies in its overall ability to provide the total services needed",
"the change it had made in the team" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.173807"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:09.329393+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.173807
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction