Authority Equal-Access Modification Permission with Public Objection
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#Authority_Equal-Access_Modification_Permission_with_Public_Objection
Properties
Instance of
Authority-PermittedEqual-AccessProcurementModificationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Authority-PermittedEqual-AccessProcurementModificationState
Active period
From authority's grant of modification permission through public and council objection period
Affected parties
All competing firms
City council members
Firm A
General public
Public utility authority
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Public utility authority's legally cleared grant of equal-access mid-process modification permission, contested by public and council on procurement-intent grounds
Terminated by
Resolution of public/council objections; final procurement selection
Triggering event
Authority receiving legal advice of no impediment and granting Firm A's modification request with equal-access condition
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
the utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A
Text references
a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it
some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal, alleging that in doing so it violated the intent of the governing procurement law, and that Firm A had acted unethically in making its request
the utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A
TTL
@prefix case162: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/162#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case162:Authority_Equal-Access_Modification_Permission_with_Public_Objection a proeth:Authority-PermittedEqual-AccessProcurementModificationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Authority Equal-Access Modification Permission with Public Objection" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From authority's grant of modification permission through public and council objection period" ;
proeth:affectedparties "All competing firms",
"City council members",
"Firm A",
"General public",
"Public utility authority" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "162" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A" ;
proeth:stateclass "Authority-Permitted Equal-Access Procurement Modification State" ;
proeth:subject "Public utility authority's legally cleared grant of equal-access mid-process modification permission, contested by public and council on procurement-intent grounds" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Resolution of public/council objections; final procurement selection" ;
proeth:textreferences "a revised qualification proposal was submitted to it",
"some members of the public and of the city council objected to allowing Firm A to alter its qualification proposal, alleging that in doing so it violated the intent of the governing procurement law, and that Firm A had acted unethically in making its request",
"the utility authority, after receiving advice that there was no legal impediment involved, granted the request of Firm A" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Authority receiving legal advice of no impediment and granting Firm A's modification request with equal-access condition" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 162 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T02:57:21.173066"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 162 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
162
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
First case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
Attributed to
Case 162 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T02:57:21.173066
Generated by
ProEthica Case 162 Extraction