Public Procurement Fairness Standard - Out-of-List Contact
Individual
c7ea17d0
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#Public_Procurement_Fairness_Standard_-_Out-of-List_Contact
Properties
Parent
PublicProcurementFairnessStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicProcurementFairnessStandard
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.85
Createdby
Professional engineering procurement norms; federal and state A/E selection frameworks
Documenttitle
Public Procurement Fairness Standard
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Public Procurement Fairness Standard
Usedby
Government agency in deciding to contact Engineer X directly
Usedincontext
The government agency's decision to contact Engineer X — a firm not on the original solicitation list — raises questions about equitable treatment of all firms in the procurement process and whether bypassing the original list is consistent with fair procurement norms
Source Evidence
Source Text
The firm of Engineer X was not on the original list of those contacted
Text References
The firm of Engineer X was not on the original list of those contacted
the government agency...then contacted Engineer X, advising him that two firms had indicated their intention to use him as a special technical consultant
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_161: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#Public_Procurement_Fairness_Standard_-_Out-of-List_Contact> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Public Procurement Fairness Standard - Out-of-List Contact" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicProcurementFairnessStandard> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
c7ea17d0164de531...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
161
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T11:32:47.840069+00:00
First Case
161
Generated
2026-03-02T11:32:47.840069+00:00
Attributed To
Case 161 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:58:20.066862
Generated By
ProEthica Case 161 Extraction