Nominal Subconsultant Arrangement — Firm A
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#Nominal_Subconsultant_Arrangement_—_Firm_A
Properties
Instance of
NominalSubconsultantArrangementMisrepresentingPrimeCapabilityState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#NominalSubconsultantArrangementMisrepresentingPrimeCapabilityState
Active period
From Firm A's submission through agency's direct contact with Engineer X
Affected parties
Engineer X
Firm A engineers
Government agency
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Firm A's qualification submission representing prime capability while planning to rely entirely on Engineer X
Terminated by
Agency bypassed Firm A and contacted Engineer X directly
Triggering event
Firm A arranged for Engineer X as subconsultant while offering to serve as prime with only brokerage/administrative contribution
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A and Firm B were primarily offering to serve in the capacity of a 'broker' and would furnish only the services involved in the negotiations and administration of the contract, looking to Engineer X as the sole technical contributor
Text references
Firm A and Firm B were primarily offering to serve in the capacity of a 'broker' and would furnish only the services involved in the negotiations and administration of the contract, looking to Engineer X as the sole technical contributor
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#Nominal_Subconsultant_Arrangement_—_Firm_A> a proeth:NominalSubconsultantArrangementMisrepresentingPrimeCapabilityState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Nominal Subconsultant Arrangement — Firm A" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Firm A's submission through agency's direct contact with Engineer X" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer X",
"Firm A engineers",
"Government agency" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "161" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T11:34:49.572726+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "161" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T11:34:49.572726+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Firm A and Firm B were primarily offering to serve in the capacity of a 'broker' and would furnish only the services involved in the negotiations and administration of the contract, looking to Engineer X as the sole technical contributor" ;
proeth:stateclass "Nominal Subconsultant Arrangement Misrepresenting Prime Capability State" ;
proeth:subject "Firm A's qualification submission representing prime capability while planning to rely entirely on Engineer X" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Agency bypassed Firm A and contacted Engineer X directly" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firm A and Firm B were primarily offering to serve in the capacity of a 'broker' and would furnish only the services involved in the negotiations and administration of the contract, looking to Engineer X as the sole technical contributor" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Firm A arranged for Engineer X as subconsultant while offering to serve as prime with only brokerage/administrative contribution" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 161 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T11:58:20.070870"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 161 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
161
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T11:34:49.572726+00:00
First case
161
Generated
2026-03-02T11:34:49.572726+00:00
Attributed to
Case 161 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T11:58:20.070870
Generated by
ProEthica Case 161 Extraction