DP7
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#DP7
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP7
Decision question
Should Engineer X accept the agency's direct solicitation and disclose his prior informal sub-consultant arrangements with Firms A and B, accept without disclosing those arrangements, or decline the direct engagement to honor his informal prior commitments?
Focus
Engineer X, having made informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firm A and Firm B simultaneously, must decide how to respond to the government agency's direct solicitation: whether to submit qualifications while disclosing his prior parallel informal arrangements, submit without disclosure, or decline the direct engagement out of loyalty to those prior arrangements.
Option1
Accept the agency's direct solicitation and proactively disclose in the qualifications submission that informal sub-consultant arrangements had already been made with both Firm A and Firm B, allowing the agency to make a fully informed procurement decision before any prime contract is executed.
Option2
Accept the agency's direct solicitation and submit qualifications on the merits, treating the prior informal arrangements as non-binding and therefore not requiring affirmative disclosure, on the grounds that no definite selection steps had been taken and the arrangements imposed no formal commitment.
Option3
Decline the agency's direct solicitation out of relational loyalty to the prior informal arrangements with Firms A and B, allowing the procurement to proceed through the original solicitation list rather than displacing the firms that had relied on Engineer X's availability in formulating their responses.
Role
Engineer X Specialist Expert Repositioned as Prime
TTL
@prefix case161: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case161:DP7 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP7" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP7" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer X accept the agency's direct solicitation and disclose his prior informal sub-consultant arrangements with Firms A and B, accept without disclosing those arrangements, or decline the direct engagement to honor his informal prior commitments?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer X, having made informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firm A and Firm B simultaneously, must decide how to respond to the government agency's direct solicitation: whether to submit qualifications while disclosing his prior parallel informal arrangements, submit without disclosure, or decline the direct engagement out of loyalty to those prior arrangements." ;
proeth:option1 "Accept the agency's direct solicitation and proactively disclose in the qualifications submission that informal sub-consultant arrangements had already been made with both Firm A and Firm B, allowing the agency to make a fully informed procurement decision before any prime contract is executed." ;
proeth:option2 "Accept the agency's direct solicitation and submit qualifications on the merits, treating the prior informal arrangements as non-binding and therefore not requiring affirmative disclosure, on the grounds that no definite selection steps had been taken and the arrangements imposed no formal commitment." ;
proeth:option3 "Decline the agency's direct solicitation out of relational loyalty to the prior informal arrangements with Firms A and B, allowing the procurement to proceed through the original solicitation list rather than displacing the firms that had relied on Engineer X's availability in formulating their responses." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer X Specialist Expert Repositioned as Prime" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T12:13:08.018887"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 161 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-03-02T12:13:08.018887
Generated by
ProEthica Case 161 Extraction