DP4
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#DP4
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision question
Should Engineer X disclose his prior informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firms A and B when submitting qualifications in response to the agency's direct solicitation, or submit qualifications without affirmative disclosure on the grounds that no definite selection steps have been taken?
Focus
Engineer X Specialist Expert Repositioned as Prime: Disclosure of Prior Informal Sub-Consultant Arrangements and Supplanting Threshold Verification Upon Direct Agency Solicitation
Option1
Submit qualifications with an explicit disclosure of the existing informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firms A and B, enabling the agency to make a fully informed procurement decision before any prime contract is executed.
Option2
Submit qualifications in response to the agency's direct solicitation without affirmatively disclosing the prior informal arrangements, on the grounds that no definite selection steps have been taken by either firm and the anti-supplanting prohibition has not been triggered.
Option3
Before responding to the agency's direct solicitation, formally withdraw from the informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firms A and B, then submit qualifications as a clean prime candidate without any conflicting prior commitments to disclose.
Role
Engineer X Specialist Expert Repositioned as Prime
TTL
@prefix case161: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/161#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case161:DP4 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP4" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer X disclose his prior informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firms A and B when submitting qualifications in response to the agency's direct solicitation, or submit qualifications without affirmative disclosure on the grounds that no definite selection steps have been taken?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer X Specialist Expert Repositioned as Prime: Disclosure of Prior Informal Sub-Consultant Arrangements and Supplanting Threshold Verification Upon Direct Agency Solicitation" ;
proeth:option1 "Submit qualifications with an explicit disclosure of the existing informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firms A and B, enabling the agency to make a fully informed procurement decision before any prime contract is executed." ;
proeth:option2 "Submit qualifications in response to the agency's direct solicitation without affirmatively disclosing the prior informal arrangements, on the grounds that no definite selection steps have been taken by either firm and the anti-supplanting prohibition has not been triggered." ;
proeth:option3 "Before responding to the agency's direct solicitation, formally withdraw from the informal sub-consultant arrangements with both Firms A and B, then submit qualifications as a clean prime candidate without any conflicting prior commitments to disclose." ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer X Specialist Expert Repositioned as Prime" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T12:13:08.018661"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 161 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-03-02T12:13:08.018661
Generated by
ProEthica Case 161 Extraction