Non-Acquiescence to Unsafe Client Directives Applied to Company B Engineers
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Non-Acquiescence_to_Unsafe_Client_Directives_Applied_to_Company_B_Engineers
Properties
Instance of
Non-AcquiescencetoUnsafeClientDirectives
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Non-AcquiescencetoUnsafeClientDirectives
Applied to
Company A's instruction to proceed with production as designed
Balancing with
Client Loyalty
Loyalty
Concrete expression
Company B engineers, having identified safety deficiencies, were obligated not to subordinate their professional safety judgment to Company A's directive (relayed through Company B officials) to proceed with production of potentially life-endangering equipment.
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Interpretation
Company A's assertion that its design was adequate and safe does not constitute an independent technical resolution of Company B engineers' safety concerns; non-acquiescence requires refusal to proceed or further escalation.
Invoked by
Company B Engineers Safety-Discovering Manufacturing Reviewers
Tension resolution
The non-acquiescence principle requires that Company B engineers not treat Company A's self-assessment as sufficient to override their own professional safety conclusions.
Source Evidence
Source text
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified.
Text references
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified.
the equipment, if built according to the original plans and specifications, might endanger the lives of persons in proximity to it
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Non-Acquiescence_to_Unsafe_Client_Directives_Applied_to_Company_B_Engineers a proeth:Non-AcquiescencetoUnsafeClientDirectives,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Non-Acquiescence to Unsafe Client Directives Applied to Company B Engineers" ;
proeth:appliedto "Company A's instruction to proceed with production as designed" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Loyalty",
"Loyalty" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Company B engineers, having identified safety deficiencies, were obligated not to subordinate their professional safety judgment to Company A's directive (relayed through Company B officials) to proceed with production of potentially life-endangering equipment." ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:30:10.564580+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:30:10.564580+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Company A's assertion that its design was adequate and safe does not constitute an independent technical resolution of Company B engineers' safety concerns; non-acquiescence requires refusal to proceed or further escalation." ;
proeth:invokedby "Company B Engineers Safety-Discovering Manufacturing Reviewers" ;
proeth:principleclass "Non-Acquiescence to Unsafe Client Directives" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The non-acquiescence principle requires that Company B engineers not treat Company A's self-assessment as sufficient to override their own professional safety conclusions." ;
proeth:textreferences "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified.",
"the equipment, if built according to the original plans and specifications, might endanger the lives of persons in proximity to it" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.982643"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:30:10.564580+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:30:10.564580+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.982643
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction