Inter-Firm Honest Safety Disagreement Impartial Referral Available
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Inter-Firm_Honest_Safety_Disagreement_Impartial_Referral_Available
Properties
Instance of
ImpartialExpertReferralAvailableforInter-FirmSafetyDisputeState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ImpartialExpertReferralAvailableforInter-FirmSafetyDisputeState
Active period
From the point at which inter-firm escalation failed to resolve the safety dispute, through the ethics board's recommendation that referral to an impartial expert body is appropriate
Affected parties
Engineers of Company A
Engineers of Company B
Public
Relevant technical engineering society
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
The unresolved technical safety disagreement between engineers of Company A and engineers of Company B regarding the machinery design
Terminated by
Referral to and determination by an impartial technical engineering society, or withdrawal of Company B engineers from the project
Triggering event
Honest difference of opinion between Company A and Company B engineers on safety features of the machinery, with no resolution achieved through direct inter-firm communication
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B' it would be appropriate for the question to be referred to an impartial body of experts, such as a technical engineering society in the particular field of practice, for an independent determination
Text references
Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B' it would be appropriate for the question to be referred to an impartial body of experts, such as a technical engineering society in the particular field of practice, for an independent determination
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Inter-Firm_Honest_Safety_Disagreement_Impartial_Referral_Available a proeth:ImpartialExpertReferralAvailableforInter-FirmSafetyDisputeState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Inter-Firm Honest Safety Disagreement Impartial Referral Available" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the point at which inter-firm escalation failed to resolve the safety dispute, through the ethics board's recommendation that referral to an impartial expert body is appropriate" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineers of Company A",
"Engineers of Company B",
"Public",
"Relevant technical engineering society" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B' it would be appropriate for the question to be referred to an impartial body of experts, such as a technical engineering society in the particular field of practice, for an independent determination" ;
proeth:stateclass "Impartial Expert Referral Available for Inter-Firm Safety Dispute State" ;
proeth:subject "The unresolved technical safety disagreement between engineers of Company A and engineers of Company B regarding the machinery design" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Referral to and determination by an impartial technical engineering society, or withdrawal of Company B engineers from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B' it would be appropriate for the question to be referred to an impartial body of experts, such as a technical engineering society in the particular field of practice, for an independent determination" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Honest difference of opinion between Company A and Company B engineers on safety features of the machinery, with no resolution achieved through direct inter-firm communication" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.991249"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.991249
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction