Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard
Confidence
0.92
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional consensus
Document title
Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Engineers of Company B upon receiving instruction to proceed despite identified miscalculations and technical deficiencies
Used in context
Governs the obligations of Company B's engineers after Company A rejected their safety concerns and Company B's officials instructed them to proceed — including duties to document, advise of risks, and determine whether escalation is required
Source Evidence
Source text
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified
Text references
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified
The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance a proeth:EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional consensus" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified" ;
proeth:textreferences "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified",
"The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineers of Company B upon receiving instruction to proceed despite identified miscalculations and technical deficiencies" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs the obligations of Company B's engineers after Company A rejected their safety concerns and Company B's officials instructed them to proceed — including duties to document, advise of risks, and determine whether escalation is required" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.988319"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.988319
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction