Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance
Individual
a22f9e2b
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance
Properties
Parent
EngineerEmployerLoyaltyvs.ProfessionalJudgmentStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerEmployerLoyaltyvs.ProfessionalJudgmentStandard
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.9
Createdby
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional consensus
Documenttitle
Engineer Employer Loyalty vs. Professional Judgment Standard
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Engineer Employer Loyalty vs. Professional Judgment Standard
Usedby
Engineers of Company B when their employer instructed them to proceed despite their professional safety findings
Usedincontext
Addresses the tension between Company B engineers' duty of loyalty to their employer and their independent professional judgment that the equipment is unsafe — including the limits of employer authority to override professional engineering assessments
Source Evidence
Source Text
The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work
Text References
The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work
the engineers of Company 'B' in reviewing the plans and specifications came to the conclusion that they included certain miscalculations and technical deficiencies
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerEmployerLoyaltyvs.ProfessionalJudgmentStandard> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
a22f9e2b70cff205...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
160
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00
First Case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00
Attributed To
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.984876
Generated By
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction