Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
ConflictingExpertReportStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConflictingExpertReportStandard
Confidence
0.82
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional consensus
Document title
Conflicting Expert Report Standard
Importance
medium
Used by
Engineers of Company B and Company A when their technical assessments of the design's adequacy and safety diverged
Used in context
Governs the situation where Company A's engineers contradict Company B's engineers' safety findings — establishing norms for how conflicting professional assessments of the same design should be handled and what obligations arise when one expert's safety findings are disputed by another
Source Evidence
Source text
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe
Text references
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe
the engineers of Company 'B' in reviewing the plans and specifications came to the conclusion that they included certain miscalculations and technical deficiencies
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Instance a proeth:ConflictingExpertReportStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Conflicting-Expert-Report-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review / Professional consensus" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Conflicting Expert Report Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Conflicting Expert Report Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe" ;
proeth:textreferences "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe",
"the engineers of Company 'B' in reviewing the plans and specifications came to the conclusion that they included certain miscalculations and technical deficiencies" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineers of Company B and Company A when their technical assessments of the design's adequacy and safety diverged" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs the situation where Company A's engineers contradict Company B's engineers' safety findings — establishing norms for how conflicting professional assessments of the same design should be handled and what obligations arise when one expert's safety findings are disputed by another" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.985243"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:23:58.075225+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.985243
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction