Company B Engineers Project Withdrawal Obligation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Company_B_Engineers_Project_Withdrawal_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
GenuineProjectWithdrawalNon-SubstitutionbyResponsibilityDisclaimerObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#GenuineProjectWithdrawalNon-SubstitutionbyResponsibilityDisclaimerObligation
Case context
Section 2(c) required engineers to notify proper authority of dangers and withdraw from further service on the project when a client or employer insists on unprofessional conduct. Company B engineers were required to effect genuine withdrawal from production participation.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineers of Company B
Obligation statement
Company B engineers were obligated to withdraw from further service on the project — refusing to proceed with production — when Company A rejected their safety concerns and Company B officials instructed continuation, under the mandate of Section 2(c) requiring withdrawal from further service on the project.
Temporal scope
Upon employer instruction to proceed with production despite unresolved safety concerns
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Project Withdrawal Obligation Applied to Company B Engineers
Source Evidence
Source text
The last sentence of Section 2(c) is likewise clear in requiring that the engineers not only notify proper authority of the dangers which they believe to exist, but that they also 'withdraw from further service on the project.' This mandate applies to engineers serving clients or employers
Text references
The last sentence of Section 2(c) is likewise clear in requiring that the engineers not only notify proper authority of the dangers which they believe to exist, but that they also 'withdraw from further service on the project.' This mandate applies to engineers serving clients or employers
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Company_B_Engineers_Project_Withdrawal_Obligation a proeth:GenuineProjectWithdrawalNon-SubstitutionbyResponsibilityDisclaimerObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Company B Engineers Project Withdrawal Obligation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case160:Company_B_Engineers_Employment_Loss_Acceptance_as_Cost_of_Safety_Refusal ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Company_B_Engineers_Competing_Duties_—_Employment_vs._Public_Safety_Withdrawal> ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case160:Company_B_Engineers_Employment_Loss_Acceptance_as_Cost_of_Safety_Refusal ;
proeth:casecontext "Section 2(c) required engineers to notify proper authority of dangers and withdraw from further service on the project when a client or employer insists on unprofessional conduct. Company B engineers were required to effect genuine withdrawal from production participation." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case160:Project_Withdrawal_Obligation_Applied_to_Company_B_Engineers ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineers of Company B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Genuine Project Withdrawal Non-Substitution by Responsibility Disclaimer Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Company B engineers were obligated to withdraw from further service on the project — refusing to proceed with production — when Company A rejected their safety concerns and Company B officials instructed continuation, under the mandate of Section 2(c) requiring withdrawal from further service on the project." ;
proeth:sourcetext "The last sentence of Section 2(c) is likewise clear in requiring that the engineers not only notify proper authority of the dangers which they believe to exist, but that they also 'withdraw from further service on the project.' This mandate applies to engineers serving clients or employers" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon employer instruction to proceed with production despite unresolved safety concerns" ;
proeth:textreferences "The last sentence of Section 2(c) is likewise clear in requiring that the engineers not only notify proper authority of the dangers which they believe to exist, but that they also 'withdraw from further service on the project.' This mandate applies to engineers serving clients or employers" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:01.003097"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:01.003097
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction