Company B Engineers Going-Along Prohibition After Employer Override
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Company_B_Engineers_Going-Along_Prohibition_After_Employer_Override
Properties
Instance of
Going-AlongProhibitionAfterClientSafetyRefusalObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Going-AlongProhibitionAfterClientSafetyRefusalObligation
Case context
After Company A dismissed safety concerns and Company B officials instructed engineers to proceed, Company B engineers faced the prohibition on going along without active dissent or escalation.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Company B Engineers
Obligation statement
Company B engineers were obligated to refrain from silently proceeding with production after their employer instructed continuation following Company A's dismissal of safety concerns, recognizing that passive acquiescence after a safety override constitutes an independent ethical violation.
Temporal scope
Upon receipt of Company B officials' instruction to proceed with production despite unresolved safety concerns
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Going-Along Prohibition Applied to Company B Engineers After Employer Override
Source Evidence
Source text
The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work.
Text references
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified.
The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work.
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Company_B_Engineers_Going-Along_Prohibition_After_Employer_Override a proeth:Going-AlongProhibitionAfterClientSafetyRefusalObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Company B Engineers Going-Along Prohibition After Employer Override" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case160:Company_B_Engineers_Passive_Acquiescence_Independent_Ethical_Failure_Risk ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case160:Company_B_Engineers_Employer-Ordered_Execution_of_Disputed_Design ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case160:Company_B_Engineers_Passive_Acquiescence_Independent_Ethical_Failure_Risk ;
proeth:casecontext "After Company A dismissed safety concerns and Company B officials instructed engineers to proceed, Company B engineers faced the prohibition on going along without active dissent or escalation." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case160:Going-Along_Prohibition_Applied_to_Company_B_Engineers_After_Employer_Override ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:33:11.646237+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:33:11.646237+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Company B Engineers" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Going-Along Prohibition After Client Safety Refusal Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Company B engineers were obligated to refrain from silently proceeding with production after their employer instructed continuation following Company A's dismissal of safety concerns, recognizing that passive acquiescence after a safety override constitutes an independent ethical violation." ;
proeth:sourcetext "The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon receipt of Company B officials' instruction to proceed with production despite unresolved safety concerns" ;
proeth:textreferences "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe and that Company 'B' should proceed to build the equipment as designed and specified.",
"The officials of Company 'B' instructed its engineers to proceed with the work." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.994606"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:33:11.646237+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:33:11.646237+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.994606
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction