Company B Engineers Employment Loss Risk from Safety Withdrawal Obligation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Company_B_Engineers_Employment_Loss_Risk_from_Safety_Withdrawal_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
EmploymentLossRiskfromSafetyObligationComplianceState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EmploymentLossRiskfromSafetyObligationComplianceState
Active period
From the point at which Company B engineers are instructed to proceed with production of the disputed design, through the ethics board's determination that employment considerations are subordinate to code requirements
Affected parties
Company B (employer)
Engineers of Company B
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Subject
Engineers of Company B facing potential employment termination as consequence of mandatory code-required refusal to proceed with unsafe design production
Terminated by
Engineers' compliance with code obligation to withdraw, or resolution of safety dispute through impartial review
Triggering event
Employer instruction to proceed with production of machinery design that Company B engineers believe is unsafe, creating direct conflict between employment obligation and mandatory code withdrawal requirement
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
While such refusal to comply with the instruction of their employer may cause a most difficult situation, or even lead to the loss of employment, we must conclude that these considerations are subordinate to the requirements of the Code
Text references
While such refusal to comply with the instruction of their employer may cause a most difficult situation, or even lead to the loss of employment, we must conclude that these considerations are subordinate to the requirements of the Code
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case160:Company_B_Engineers_Employment_Loss_Risk_from_Safety_Withdrawal_Obligation a proeth:EmploymentLossRiskfromSafetyObligationComplianceState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Company B Engineers Employment Loss Risk from Safety Withdrawal Obligation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the point at which Company B engineers are instructed to proceed with production of the disputed design, through the ethics board's determination that employment considerations are subordinate to code requirements" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Company B (employer)",
"Engineers of Company B" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "While such refusal to comply with the instruction of their employer may cause a most difficult situation, or even lead to the loss of employment, we must conclude that these considerations are subordinate to the requirements of the Code" ;
proeth:stateclass "Employment Loss Risk from Safety Obligation Compliance State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineers of Company B facing potential employment termination as consequence of mandatory code-required refusal to proceed with unsafe design production" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineers' compliance with code obligation to withdraw, or resolution of safety dispute through impartial review" ;
proeth:textreferences "While such refusal to comply with the instruction of their employer may cause a most difficult situation, or even lead to the loss of employment, we must conclude that these considerations are subordinate to the requirements of the Code" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Employer instruction to proceed with production of machinery design that Company B engineers believe is unsafe, creating direct conflict between employment obligation and mandatory code withdrawal requirement" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.991392"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:27:29.252806+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.991392
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction