Company A Engineers Honest Disagreement Non-Ethical-Violation Recognition

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Company_A_Engineers_Honest_Disagreement_Non-Ethical-Violation_Recognition
Properties
Instance of
HonestTechnicalDisagreementNon-Ethical-ViolationRecognitionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#HonestTechnicalDisagreementNon-Ethical-ViolationRecognitionObligation
Case context
The BER characterized the disagreement between Company A and Company B engineers as an 'apparent honest difference of opinion' rather than treating Company A's position as inherently unethical, while still holding that Company B engineers were required to refuse production participation.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Obligated party
BER Ethics Board
Obligation statement
The BER was obligated to recognize that the disagreement between Company A engineers (asserting design adequacy) and Company B engineers (identifying miscalculations) constituted an apparent honest difference of opinion among qualified engineers, and that neither position was inherently unethical — the ethical question turning on whether each party acted with integrity and fulfilled their respective professional obligations.
Temporal scope
At the point of ethics adjudication
Source Evidence
Source text
Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B'

Text references
Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B'
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case160:Company_A_Engineers_Honest_Disagreement_Non-Ethical-Violation_Recognition a proeth:HonestTechnicalDisagreementNon-Ethical-ViolationRecognitionObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Company A Engineers Honest Disagreement Non-Ethical-Violation Recognition" ; proeth:casecontext "The BER characterized the disagreement between Company A and Company B engineers as an 'apparent honest difference of opinion' rather than treating Company A's position as inherently unethical, while still holding that Company B engineers were required to refuse production participation." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case160:Honest_Disagreement_Among_Qualified_Engineers_Permissibility_Applied_to_Company_A_vs_Company_B ; proeth:discoveredincase "160" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:obligatedparty "BER Ethics Board" ; proeth:obligationclass "Honest Technical Disagreement Non-Ethical-Violation Recognition Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "The BER was obligated to recognize that the disagreement between Company A engineers (asserting design adequacy) and Company B engineers (identifying miscalculations) constituted an apparent honest difference of opinion among qualified engineers, and that neither position was inherently unethical — the ethical question turning on whether each party acted with integrity and fulfilled their respective professional obligations." ; proeth:sourcetext "Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B'" ; proeth:temporalscope "At the point of ethics adjudication" ; proeth:textreferences "Where, as in this case, there is an apparent honest difference of opinion as to the safety features of the machinery between the engineers of Company 'A' and the engineers of Company 'B'" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:01.004023"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:42:46.371997+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:01.004023
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction