Company A Engineers Deficient Machinery Designers

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#Company_A_Engineers_Deficient_Machinery_Designers
Definition

Prepared plans and specifications for machinery to be used in a manufacturing process; those plans contained miscalculations and technical deficiencies rendering the equipment potentially unsafe; dismissed Company B engineers' safety concerns and asserted the design was adequate.

Properties
Instance of
DeficientMachineryDesignEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#DeficientMachineryDesignEngineer
Attributes
employerCompany A
functionOriginal design and specification of machinery
response_to_safety_concernDismissed — asserted design was adequate and safe
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Relationships
typeemployed_by
targetCompany A Officials Safety-Concern-Dismissing Authority
typepeer_review_subject
targetCompany B Engineers Safety Reviewers
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineers of Company 'A' prepared plans and specifications for machinery

Text references
Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe
Engineers of Company 'A' prepared plans and specifications for machinery
TTL
@prefix case160: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/160#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case160:Company_A_Engineers_Deficient_Machinery_Designers a proeth:DeficientMachineryDesignEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Company A Engineers Deficient Machinery Designers" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case160:Cross-Firm_Safety_Dispute_Impartial_Technical_Resolution_Invoked, case160:Do_No_Harm_Obligation_Applied_to_Company_A_Design_Engineers, case160:Honest_Disagreement_Among_Qualified_Engineers_Permissibility_Applied_to_Company_A_vs_Company_B ; proeth-core:hasObligation case160:Company_A_Engineers_Objective_Review_of_External_Safety_Notification, case160:Cross-Firm_Honest_Safety_Disagreement_Impartial_Referral_Recommendation ; proeth:attributes "{'employer': 'Company A', 'function': 'Original design and specification of machinery', 'response_to_safety_concern': 'Dismissed — asserted design was adequate and safe'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Prepared plans and specifications for machinery to be used in a manufacturing process; those plans contained miscalculations and technical deficiencies rendering the equipment potentially unsafe; dismissed Company B engineers' safety concerns and asserted the design was adequate." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:discoveredincase "160" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T14:24:29.999661+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "160" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T14:24:29.999661+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'employed_by', 'target': 'Company A Officials Safety-Concern-Dismissing Authority'}", "{'type': 'peer_review_subject', 'target': 'Company B Engineers Safety Reviewers'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Deficient Machinery Design Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineers of Company 'A' prepared plans and specifications for machinery" ; proeth:textreferences "Company 'A' replied that its engineers felt that the design and specifications for the equipment were adequate and safe", "Engineers of Company 'A' prepared plans and specifications for machinery" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 160 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T14:53:00.989034"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 160 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
160
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T14:24:29.999661+00:00
First case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:24:29.999661+00:00
Attributed to
Case 160 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T14:53:00.989034
Generated by
ProEthica Case 160 Extraction