DP6
Individual
c48c04c3
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/16#DP6
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP6
Decision Question
Upon completing his independent structural review and discovering serious design errors attributable to Engineer B's impaired practice, did Engineer R bear a distinct and non-delegable obligation to report Engineer B to the State Board independently of whatever action Engineer A chose to take?
Focus
Engineer R's independent reporting obligation upon discovering serious design errors through formal structural review
Option1
Report Engineer B's impaired practice and the documented design errors to the State Board independently upon completing the structural review, without conditioning that report on Engineer A's prior action or consent
Option2
Notify Engineer A of the obligation to report and allow Engineer A a defined period to initiate reporting to the State Board before Engineer R files an independent report, treating coordinated disclosure as the preferred pathway while preserving the independent reporting option as a backstop
Option3
Limit Engineer R's professional response to completing the technical redesign and documenting the findings in the project record, treating the reporting decision as Engineer A's responsibility as the retaining client and primary party with knowledge of Engineer B's impairment
Role Label
Engineer R
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_16: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/16> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/16#DP6> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP6" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
c48c04c3e7bbbfa0...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T17:30:39.263617
Generated By
ProEthica Case 16 Extraction