Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
EngineerEmployerLoyaltyvs.ProfessionalJudgmentStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerEmployerLoyaltyvs.ProfessionalJudgmentStandard
Confidence
0.78
Created by
NSPE professional ethics framework
Document title
Engineer Employer Loyalty vs. Professional Judgment Standard
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE BER in determining the ethical propriety of Engineer A's course of action
Used in context
Provides the normative framework for evaluating whether Engineer A's persistent internal advocacy against management decisions was ethically proper, and the degree of ethical responsibility engineers bear when employers override their professional judgments
Version
N/A
Source Evidence
Source text
He has requested an ethical review and determination of the propriety of his course of action and the degree of ethical responsibility of engineers in such circumstances.
Text references
He has requested an ethical review and determination of the propriety of his course of action and the degree of ethical responsibility of engineers in such circumstances.
management placed a critical memorandum in his personnel file, and subsequently placed him on three months' probation, with the further notation that if his job performance did not improve, he would be terminated.
TTL
@prefix case157: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case157:Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance a proeth:EngineerEmployerLoyaltyvs.ProfessionalJudgmentStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Employer-Loyalty-vs-Professional-Judgment-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.78" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE professional ethics framework" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "157" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Employer Loyalty vs. Professional Judgment Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T19:18:21.015874+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "157" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T19:18:21.015874+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Employer Loyalty vs. Professional Judgment Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "He has requested an ethical review and determination of the propriety of his course of action and the degree of ethical responsibility of engineers in such circumstances." ;
proeth:textreferences "He has requested an ethical review and determination of the propriety of his course of action and the degree of ethical responsibility of engineers in such circumstances.",
"management placed a critical memorandum in his personnel file, and subsequently placed him on three months' probation, with the further notation that if his job performance did not improve, he would be terminated." ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE BER in determining the ethical propriety of Engineer A's course of action" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Provides the normative framework for evaluating whether Engineer A's persistent internal advocacy against management decisions was ethically proper, and the degree of ethical responsibility engineers bear when employers override their professional judgments" ;
proeth:version "N/A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 157 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T19:40:53.881358"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 157 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
157
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T19:18:21.015874+00:00
First case
157
Generated
2026-03-01T19:18:21.015874+00:00
Attributed to
Case 157 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T19:40:53.881358
Generated by
ProEthica Case 157 Extraction