Defense Subcontractor

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#Defense_Subcontractor
Definition

The subcontractor whose plans and material submissions were reviewed by Engineer A and found to be deficient, representing excessive cost and time delays; Engineer A urged management to reject the work and require redesign.

Properties
Instance of
DefenseSubcontractorSubmissionSubject
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#DefenseSubcontractorSubmissionSubject
Attributes
contextDefense industry supply chain
issueDeficient submissions representing excessive cost and time delays
Confidence
0.85
Importance
medium
Relationships
typereviewed_by
targetEngineer A Defense Industry Whistleblower Engineer
typesubject_to_authority_of
targetLarge Industrial Defense Company Management
Role category
participant
Source Evidence
Source text
review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors

Text references
review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors
the subcontractor's submission represented excessive cost and time delays
urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined
TTL
@prefix case157: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/157#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case157:Defense_Subcontractor a proeth:DefenseSubcontractorSubmissionSubject, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Defense Subcontractor" ; proeth:attributes "{'context': 'Defense industry supply chain', 'issue': 'Deficient submissions representing excessive cost and time delays'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "The subcontractor whose plans and material submissions were reviewed by Engineer A and found to be deficient, representing excessive cost and time delays; Engineer A urged management to reject the work and require redesign." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.85" ; proeth:discoveredincase "157" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T19:18:06.590651+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "157" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T19:18:06.590651+00:00" ; proeth:importance "medium" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'reviewed_by', 'target': 'Engineer A Defense Industry Whistleblower Engineer'}", "{'type': 'subject_to_authority_of', 'target': 'Large Industrial Defense Company Management'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "participant" ; proeth:roleclass "Defense Subcontractor Submission Subject" ; proeth:sourcetext "review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors" ; proeth:textreferences "review of the adequacy and acceptability of the plans for material provided by subcontractors", "the subcontractor's submission represented excessive cost and time delays", "urged management to reject such work and require the subcontractors to correct the deficiencies he outlined" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 157 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T19:40:53.880259"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 157 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
157
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T19:18:06.590651+00:00
First case
157
Generated
2026-03-01T19:18:06.590651+00:00
Attributed to
Case 157 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T19:40:53.880259
Generated by
ProEthica Case 157 Extraction