Present Case Peer Review Consent Refused
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Present_Case_Peer_Review_Consent_Refused
Definition
Engineer A's refusal to consent to and cooperate with Engineer B's peer review in the present case
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewConsentRefusedState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewConsentRefusedState
Active period
From Owner's notification of Engineer A through Engineer A's decision to cooperate or Owner's decision to proceed without Engineer A
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Owner
Confidence
0.88
Principle Transformation
Transforms the general principle of professional respect into a concrete tension between respecting a peer's objection and fulfilling a duty to the public and client when prior errors are known.
Subject
Engineer A's refusal to consent to and cooperate with Engineer B's peer review in the present case
Terminated by
Engineer A agrees to cooperate, or Owner proceeds without Engineer A
Triggering event
Owner notifies Engineer A of the planned peer review per Professional Obligation III.7.a.
Urgency level
high
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatedByEvent
Notification Obligation Triggered
activatesConstraint
Engineer A Safety Review Consent Limit
activatesObligation
Engineer A Safety Review Consent
affects
Agent Engineer A, Agent Engineer B, Agent Owner
terminatedByEvent
Peer Review Blocked
Source Evidence
Text references
Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review
While Professional Obligation III.7.a. does not require the consent of the engineer whose work is being reviewed, it will likely be a fruitless exercise to attempt to conduct a peer review without Engineer A's cooperation
Source text
Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Present_Case_Peer_Review_Consent_Refused a proeth:PeerReviewConsentRefusedState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Present Case Peer Review Consent Refused" ;
proeth-core:activatedByEvent case15:Notification_Obligation_Triggered ;
proeth-core:activatesConstraint case15:Engineer_A_Safety_Review_Consent_Limit ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case15:Engineer_A_Safety_Review_Consent ;
proeth-core:affects case15:Agent_Engineer_A,
case15:Agent_Engineer_B,
case15:Agent_Owner ;
proeth-core:terminatedByEvent case15:Peer_Review_Blocked ;
proeth:activePeriod "From Owner's notification of Engineer A through Engineer A's decision to cooperate or Owner's decision to proceed without Engineer A" ;
proeth:affectedParties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Owner" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms the general principle of professional respect into a concrete tension between respecting a peer's objection and fulfilling a duty to the public and client when prior errors are known." ;
proeth:stateClass "Peer Review Consent Refused State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's refusal to consent to and cooperate with Engineer B's peer review in the present case" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Engineer A agrees to cooperate, or Owner proceeds without Engineer A" ;
proeth:textReferences "Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review",
"While Professional Obligation III.7.a. does not require the consent of the engineer whose work is being reviewed, it will likely be a fruitless exercise to attempt to conduct a peer review without Engineer A's cooperation" ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "Owner notifies Engineer A of the planned peer review per Professional Obligation III.7.a." ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "high" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A's refusal to consent to and cooperate with Engineer B's peer review in the present case" ;
skos:definition "Engineer A's refusal to consent to and cooperate with Engineer B's peer review in the present case" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction